Selection for orchardgrass seed yield in target vs. nontarget environments

被引:20
|
作者
Casler, MD [1 ]
Barker, RE
Brummer, EC
Papadopolous, YA
Hoffman, LD
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, USDA ARS, US Dairy Forage Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Forage Seed Prod Res Ctr, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
[5] Livestock Res Ctr, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Agron, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2003.0532
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Simultaneous improvement of forage traits and seed yield in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) has been problematic because of geographic separation of forage and seed production locations. Previous work has shown that a complex multilocation selection program in forage production environments can increase forage yield as well as seed yield in Oregon. The objective of this experiment was to compare target-environment (TE) and nontarget-environment (NTE) selection approaches for increasing seed yield of orchardgrass in Oregon. Two cycles of recurrent phenotypic selection for panicle seed mass (PSM) and agronomic traits were conducted on four populationsin four eastern USA locations (NTE) and one Oregon location (TE). Seed yield was increased in three of four orchardgrass populations by TE selection, averaging 5.1% cycle(-1), but was improved by NTE selection in only one of four populations. Conversely, TE selection for PSM and agronomic traits resulted in no changes to forage yield in the eastern USA and Canada, while NTE selection for PSM and agronomic traits increased forage yield in two of four populations, confirming results of a previous study. It appears that the most efficient system for simultaneously improving forage and seed traits of orchardgrass would be to practice selection for forage traits in forage production environments and seed traits in seed production environments, with sufficiently large populations to allow multitrait selection.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Microcirculation vs. Mitochondria-What to Target?
    Merz, Tamara
    Denoix, Nicole
    Huber-Lang, Markus
    Singer, Mervyn
    Radermacher, Peter
    McCook, Oscar
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [43] Village Community: Seed of Hope vs. Frame of Regulation
    Kim, Sangho
    SPACE, 2012, (533): : 76 - 80
  • [44] Eudaimonie vs. Hedonie als Therapieziel in der PsychotherapieEudaimonia vs. hedonism as therapy target in psychotherapy
    Michael Linden
    Die Psychotherapie, 2024, 69 (1) : 63 - 66
  • [45] Thermodynamic vs. Kinetic Basis for Polymorph Selection
    Hodnett, Benjamin K.
    Verma, Vivek
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (05)
  • [46] Inbreeding and selection response for genome-wide selection vs. traditional selection
    Stachowicz, K.
    Sargolzaei, M.
    Wilton, J. W.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 89 (01) : 131 - 131
  • [47] Navigation Modes in Virtual Environments: Walking vs. Joystick
    Peng, Peng
    Riecke, Bernhard E.
    Williams, Betsy
    McNamara, Timothy P.
    Bodenheimer, Bobby
    APGV 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED PERCEPTION IN GRAPHICS AND VISUALIZATION, 2008, : 192 - 192
  • [48] Distributed operating systems vs. distributed system environments
    Jia, XH
    Cheng, W
    COMPUTER SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1997, 12 (03): : 193 - 203
  • [49] Enthalpic Vs. Entropic Effects of Crowded Cellular Environments
    Feig, Michael
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 98 (03) : 4A - 4A