Selection for orchardgrass seed yield in target vs. nontarget environments

被引:20
|
作者
Casler, MD [1 ]
Barker, RE
Brummer, EC
Papadopolous, YA
Hoffman, LD
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, USDA ARS, US Dairy Forage Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Forage Seed Prod Res Ctr, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
[5] Livestock Res Ctr, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Agron, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2003.0532
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Simultaneous improvement of forage traits and seed yield in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) has been problematic because of geographic separation of forage and seed production locations. Previous work has shown that a complex multilocation selection program in forage production environments can increase forage yield as well as seed yield in Oregon. The objective of this experiment was to compare target-environment (TE) and nontarget-environment (NTE) selection approaches for increasing seed yield of orchardgrass in Oregon. Two cycles of recurrent phenotypic selection for panicle seed mass (PSM) and agronomic traits were conducted on four populationsin four eastern USA locations (NTE) and one Oregon location (TE). Seed yield was increased in three of four orchardgrass populations by TE selection, averaging 5.1% cycle(-1), but was improved by NTE selection in only one of four populations. Conversely, TE selection for PSM and agronomic traits resulted in no changes to forage yield in the eastern USA and Canada, while NTE selection for PSM and agronomic traits increased forage yield in two of four populations, confirming results of a previous study. It appears that the most efficient system for simultaneously improving forage and seed traits of orchardgrass would be to practice selection for forage traits in forage production environments and seed traits in seed production environments, with sufficiently large populations to allow multitrait selection.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SELECTION FOR YIELD AND QUALITY IN ORCHARDGRASS
    SHENK, JS
    WESTERHAUS, MO
    CROP SCIENCE, 1982, 22 (02) : 422 - 425
  • [2] Effects of high- vs. low-yield environments on selection for increased biomass yield in switchgrass
    Rose, Louis W.
    Das, Modan K.
    Fuentes, Roger G.
    Taliaferro, Charles M.
    EUPHYTICA, 2007, 156 (03) : 407 - 415
  • [3] Effects of high- vs. low-yield environments on selection for increased biomass yield in switchgrass
    Louis W. Rose
    Modan K. Das
    Roger G. Fuentes
    Charles M. Taliaferro
    Euphytica, 2007, 156 : 407 - 415
  • [4] Convergent divergent selection for seed production and forage traits in orchardgrass .2. Seed yield response in Oregon
    Barker, RE
    Casler, MD
    Carlson, IT
    Berg, CC
    Sleper, DA
    Young, WC
    CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (04) : 1054 - 1059
  • [5] Regional development of orchardgrass choke and estimation of seed yield loss
    Pfender, WF
    Alderman, SC
    PLANT DISEASE, 2006, 90 (02) : 240 - 244
  • [6] Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield
    Cooper, M
    Stucker, RE
    DeLacy, IH
    Harch, BD
    CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (04) : 1168 - 1176
  • [7] Half-sib family selection for forage yield in orchardgrass
    Casler, MD
    Fales, SL
    McElroy, AR
    Hall, MH
    Hoffman, LD
    Undersander, DJ
    Leath, KT
    PLANT BREEDING, 2002, 121 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [8] Recurrent restricted phenotypic selection for forage yield in timothy and orchardgrass
    Shateryan, D
    Coulman, BE
    Mather, DE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1995, 75 (04) : 871 - 875
  • [9] Spring nitrogen and plant growth regulator effects on seed yield of orchardgrass
    Anderson, Nicole P.
    Morad, Mohammed M.
    Chastain, Thomas G.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2024, 64 (06) : 3533 - 3540
  • [10] Seed Selection for Spread of Influence in Social Networks: Temporal vs. Static Approach
    Michalski, Radoslaw
    Kajdanowicz, Tomasz
    Brodka, Piotr
    Kazienko, Przemyslaw
    NEW GENERATION COMPUTING, 2014, 32 (3-4) : 213 - 235