Soil functions and ecosystem services in conventional, conservation, and integrated agricultural systems. A review

被引:100
|
作者
Stavi, Ilan [1 ]
Bel, Golan [2 ]
Zaady, Eli [3 ]
机构
[1] Dead Sea & Arava Sci Ctr, IL-88820 Yotvata, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, Dept Solar Energy & Environm Phys, Sede Boqer Campus, IL-8499000 Sede Boqer, Israel
[3] Agr Res Org, Dept Nat Resources, Gilat Res Ctr, IL-85280 Gilat, Israel
关键词
Agricultural intensity; Cropping systems; Ecological impact assessment; Environmental health; Greenhouse gas emissions; Land degradation and desertification; Low-input agriculture; Sustainable farming; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NO-TILL; PEST-MANAGEMENT; WEED-CONTROL; NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT; FOOD SECURITY; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; NEMATODE POPULATIONS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CROPPING SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-016-0368-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soil tillage, crop residue management, nutrient management, and pest management are among the core farming practices. Each of these practices impacts a range of soil functions and ecosystem services, including water availability for crops, weed control, insect and pathogen control, soil quality and functioning, soil erosion control, soil organic carbon pool, environmental pollution control, greenhouse gas refuse, and crop yield productivity. In this study, we reviewed relevant bibliography and then developed a simple conceptual model, in which these soil functions and ecosystem services were scored and compared between conventional, conservation, and integrated agricultural systems. Using this conceptual model revealed that the overall agro-environmental score, excluding crop yield productivity, is largest for conservation systems (71.9 %), intermediate for integrated systems (68.8 %), and the smallest for conventional systems (52.1 %). At the same time, the crop yield productivity score is largest for integrated systems (83.3 %), intermediate for conventional systems (66.7 %), and the smallest for conservation systems (58.3 %). This study shows the potential of moderate-intensity and integrated farming systems in carrying on global food security while adequately sustaining environmental quality and ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiscale Integrated Evaluation of Agricultural Systems. An Extended LCA Approach
    Zucaro, Amalia
    Viglia, Silvio
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY AND SMART FUTURE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, : 253 - 267
  • [42] A background of forests functions as a part of ecosystem services systems
    Schneider, Jiri
    Vyskot, Ilja
    Lorencova, Helena
    Lampartova, Ivana
    PROCEEDINGS FROM IX. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED BUSINESS RESEARCH (ICABR 2014), 2015, : 1015 - 1023
  • [43] Research on ecosystem services of water conservation and soil retention: a bibliometric analysis
    Liu, Sinuo
    Lei, Yin
    Zhao, Jinsong
    Yu, Shuxia
    Wang, Ling
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (03) : 2995 - 3007
  • [44] Dataset of Indicators for the Assessment of Ecosystem Services Affected by Agricultural Soil Management
    Paul, Carsten
    Donmez, Cenk
    Koeppe, Petra
    Robinson, James S.
    Barnickel, Sonja
    DATA, 2022, 7 (08)
  • [45] Research on ecosystem services of water conservation and soil retention: a bibliometric analysis
    Sinuo Liu
    Yin Lei
    Jinsong Zhao
    Shuxia Yu
    Ling Wang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 2995 - 3007
  • [46] Optimizing the Delivery of Multiple Ecosystem Goods and Services in Agricultural Systems
    Tsiafouli, Maria A.
    Drakou, Evangelia G.
    Orgiazzi, Alberto
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Ritz, Karl
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 5
  • [47] Systematic review of soil ecosystem services in tropical regions
    Rodrigues, Aline F.
    Latawiec, Agnieszka E.
    Reid, Brian J.
    Solorzano, Alexandro
    Schuler, Azeneth E.
    Lacerda, Carine
    Fidalgo, Elaine C. C.
    Scarano, Fabio R.
    Tubenchlak, Fernanda
    Pena, Ingrid
    Vicente-Vicente, Jose Luis
    Korys, Katarzyna A.
    Cooper, Miguel
    Fernandes, Nelson F.
    Prado, Rachel B.
    Maioli, Veronica
    Dib, Viviane
    Teixeira, Wenceslau G.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (03):
  • [48] WATERMOD 2: Soil water dynamics in agricultural and environmental systems.
    Burras, L
    CROP SCIENCE, 1999, 39 (01) : 284 - 284
  • [49] Comparison of methods to assess the sustainability of agricultural systems. A review
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Guichard, Laurence
    Keichinger, Olivier
    Girardin, Philippe
    Galan, Marie-Beatrice
    Gaillard, Gerard
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 29 (01) : 223 - 235
  • [50] Saffron, an alternative crop for sustainable agricultural systems. A review
    F. Gresta
    G. M. Lombardo
    L. Siracusa
    G. Ruberto
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008, 28 : 95 - 112