Soil functions and ecosystem services in conventional, conservation, and integrated agricultural systems. A review

被引:100
|
作者
Stavi, Ilan [1 ]
Bel, Golan [2 ]
Zaady, Eli [3 ]
机构
[1] Dead Sea & Arava Sci Ctr, IL-88820 Yotvata, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, Dept Solar Energy & Environm Phys, Sede Boqer Campus, IL-8499000 Sede Boqer, Israel
[3] Agr Res Org, Dept Nat Resources, Gilat Res Ctr, IL-85280 Gilat, Israel
关键词
Agricultural intensity; Cropping systems; Ecological impact assessment; Environmental health; Greenhouse gas emissions; Land degradation and desertification; Low-input agriculture; Sustainable farming; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NO-TILL; PEST-MANAGEMENT; WEED-CONTROL; NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT; FOOD SECURITY; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; NEMATODE POPULATIONS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CROPPING SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-016-0368-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soil tillage, crop residue management, nutrient management, and pest management are among the core farming practices. Each of these practices impacts a range of soil functions and ecosystem services, including water availability for crops, weed control, insect and pathogen control, soil quality and functioning, soil erosion control, soil organic carbon pool, environmental pollution control, greenhouse gas refuse, and crop yield productivity. In this study, we reviewed relevant bibliography and then developed a simple conceptual model, in which these soil functions and ecosystem services were scored and compared between conventional, conservation, and integrated agricultural systems. Using this conceptual model revealed that the overall agro-environmental score, excluding crop yield productivity, is largest for conservation systems (71.9 %), intermediate for integrated systems (68.8 %), and the smallest for conventional systems (52.1 %). At the same time, the crop yield productivity score is largest for integrated systems (83.3 %), intermediate for conventional systems (66.7 %), and the smallest for conservation systems (58.3 %). This study shows the potential of moderate-intensity and integrated farming systems in carrying on global food security while adequately sustaining environmental quality and ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] EVOLUTION OF SOIL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES UNDER DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS: A REVIEW
    Dusa, Elena Mirela
    Stan, Vasilica
    Stanciu, Ana Maria
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2022, 65 (02): : 61 - 75
  • [12] Soil quality indicators - From soil functions to ecosystem services
    Drobnik, Thomas
    Greiner, Lucie
    Keller, Armin
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 151 - 169
  • [13] How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
    Notaro, Martin
    Gary, Christian
    Le Coq, Jean-Francois
    Metay, Aurelie
    Rapidel, Bruno
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 196
  • [14] Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review
    Bertrand, Michel
    Barot, Sebastien
    Blouin, Manuel
    Whalen, Joann
    de Oliveira, Tatiana
    Roger-Estrade, Jean
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (02) : 553 - 567
  • [15] Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review
    Michel Bertrand
    Sébastien Barot
    Manuel Blouin
    Joann Whalen
    Tatiana de Oliveira
    Jean Roger-Estrade
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35 : 553 - 567
  • [16] European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review
    Boris T. van Zanten
    Peter H. Verburg
    Maria Espinosa
    Sergio Gomez-y-Paloma
    Giuliano Galimberti
    Jochen Kantelhardt
    Martin Kapfer
    Marianne Lefebvre
    Rosa Manrique
    Annette Piorr
    Meri Raggi
    Lena Schaller
    Stefano Targetti
    Ingo Zasada
    Davide Viaggi
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014, 34 : 309 - 325
  • [17] European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review
    van Zanten, Boris T.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Espinosa, Maria
    Gomez-y-Paloma, Sergio
    Galimberti, Giuliano
    Kantelhardt, Jochen
    Kapfer, Martin
    Lefebvre, Marianne
    Manrique, Rosa
    Piorr, Annette
    Raggi, Meri
    Schaller, Lena
    Targetti, Stefano
    Zasada, Ingo
    Viaggi, Davide
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 34 (02) : 309 - 325
  • [18] Managing ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: are the solutions the same?
    Macfadyen, Sarina
    Cunningham, Saul A.
    Costamagna, Alejandro C.
    Schellhorn, Nancy A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2012, 49 (03) : 690 - 694
  • [19] Additionality in Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: Agricultural Conservation Subsidies in Maryland
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2021, 97 (02) : 305 - 320
  • [20] A conservation industry for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Yang, Wanhong
    Bryan, Brett A.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Ward, John R.
    Wells, Geoff
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Connor, Jeffrey D.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) : 680 - 689