Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Jin-an [1 ]
Zeng, Hao-long [2 ]
Deng, Ling-yan [2 ]
Li, Hui-jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Blood Transfus, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; IgG; IgM; chemiluminescence; CORONAVIRUS NUCLEOCAPSID PROTEIN; SYNDROME SARS CORONAVIRUS; ANTIBODIES; PNEUMONIA; PROFILE; ELISA;
D O I
10.1007/s11596-021-2349-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Serology tests for viral antibodies provide an important tool to support nucleic acid testing for diagnosis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is useful for documenting previous exposures to SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent of COVID-19. The sensitivities of the chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM immunoassay were assessed by using serum samples collected from 728 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The specificity was evaluated on a panel of 60 serum samples from non-COVID-19 patients with high levels of rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, or antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), mycoplasma pneumonia, human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, influenza A or influenza B. The imprecision and interference were assessed by adopting the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A2 and EP7-A2, respectively. Sensitivities between 1 and 65 days after onset of symptoms were 94.4% and 78.7%, for IgG and IgM test, respectively. The sensitivity increased with the time after symptom onset, and rose to the top on the 22nd to 28th days. The total imprecision (CVs) was less than 6.0% for IgG and less than 6.5% for IgM. Limited cross-reactions with antibodies against EBV, CMV, mycoplasma pneumonia, human RSV, adenovirus, influenza A or influenza B were found. These data suggested the chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, assay with reliable utility and sensitivity, could be used for rapid screening and retrospective surveillance of COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 322
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies to an Automated Chemiluminescent Serological Immunoassay
    Grenache, David G.
    Ye, Chunyan
    Bradfute, Steven B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 6 (02): : 491 - 495
  • [42] Clinical assessment of SNIBE Maglumi SARS-CoV-2 antigen fully-automated chemiluminescent immunoassay
    Pighi, Laura
    Henry, Brandon M.
    De Nitto, Simone
    Gianfilippi, Gianluca
    Salvagno, Gian Luca
    Plebani, Mario
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 61 (08) : 1506 - 1510
  • [43] Assessment of the clinical and analytical performance of the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay using the VALCOR protocol
    Dhillon, Sharonjit K.
    Simoens, Cindy
    Cuypers, Lize
    Bode, Jannes
    Bonde, Jesper
    Corbisier, Philippe
    Cocuzza, Clementina E.
    Van Ranst, Marc
    Arbyn, Marc
    VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [44] Assessment of the clinical and analytical performance of the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay using the VALCOR protocol
    Sharonjit K. Dhillon
    Cindy Simoens
    Lize Cuypers
    Jannes Bode
    Jesper Bonde
    Philippe Corbisier
    Clementina E. Cocuzza
    Marc Van Ranst
    Marc Arbyn
    Virology Journal, 20
  • [45] Correlation between the atellica SARS-COV-2 IGG assay results and the presence of SARS-COV-2 neutralizing antibodies
    Bedini, J.
    Filella, X.
    Hidalgo, S.
    Gonzalez-Escribano, C.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 530 : S320 - S320
  • [46] Performance assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgM & IgG ELISAs in comparison with plaque reduction neutralization test
    Kulkarni, Ruta
    Shrivastava, Shubham
    Patil, Harshad
    Kore, Pravin
    Rane, Prajakta
    Palkar, Sonali
    Lalwani, Sanjay
    Mishra, Akhilesh
    Arankalle, Vidya
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 153 (05) : 658 - 664
  • [47] Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests
    Maine, Gabriel N.
    Krishnan, Subhashree Mallika
    Walewski, Kelly
    Trueman, Jillian
    Sykes, Elizabeth
    Sun, Qian
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 503
  • [48] Performance of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for SARS-COV-2 IgM and head-to-head comparison of Abbott and Roche COVID-19 antibody assays
    Lau, C. S.
    Hoo, S. P.
    Liang, Y. L.
    Phua, S. K.
    Aw, T. C.
    PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 25
  • [49] Are IgG and IgM antibodies against the S and N antigens of SARS-CoV-2 always predictors of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection?
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Henry, Brandon M.
    Pighi, Laura
    De Nitto, Simone
    Salvagno, Gian Luca
    ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE-AVANCES EN MEDICINA DE LABORATORIO, 2023, 4 (02): : 180 - 184
  • [50] Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 antibody study using the Easy Check COVID-19 IgM/IgG™ lateral flow assay
    Higgins, Renee L.
    Rawlings, Stephen A.
    Case, Jamie
    Lee, Florence Y.
    Chan, Clarence W.
    Barrick, Bethany
    Burger, Zoe C.
    Yeo, Kiang-Teck J.
    Marrinucci, Dena
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):