Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Jin-an [1 ]
Zeng, Hao-long [2 ]
Deng, Ling-yan [2 ]
Li, Hui-jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Blood Transfus, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; IgG; IgM; chemiluminescence; CORONAVIRUS NUCLEOCAPSID PROTEIN; SYNDROME SARS CORONAVIRUS; ANTIBODIES; PNEUMONIA; PROFILE; ELISA;
D O I
10.1007/s11596-021-2349-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Serology tests for viral antibodies provide an important tool to support nucleic acid testing for diagnosis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is useful for documenting previous exposures to SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent of COVID-19. The sensitivities of the chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM immunoassay were assessed by using serum samples collected from 728 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The specificity was evaluated on a panel of 60 serum samples from non-COVID-19 patients with high levels of rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, or antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), mycoplasma pneumonia, human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, influenza A or influenza B. The imprecision and interference were assessed by adopting the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A2 and EP7-A2, respectively. Sensitivities between 1 and 65 days after onset of symptoms were 94.4% and 78.7%, for IgG and IgM test, respectively. The sensitivity increased with the time after symptom onset, and rose to the top on the 22nd to 28th days. The total imprecision (CVs) was less than 6.0% for IgG and less than 6.5% for IgM. Limited cross-reactions with antibodies against EBV, CMV, mycoplasma pneumonia, human RSV, adenovirus, influenza A or influenza B were found. These data suggested the chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, assay with reliable utility and sensitivity, could be used for rapid screening and retrospective surveillance of COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 322
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic performance of an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies detection: A real life experience
    Villalta, Danilo
    Martelli, Paola
    Moratto, Anna
    Salgarolo, Valeria
    Ligato, Elita
    Conte, Mariaelisabetta
    Giacomello, Roberto
    Pellis, Tommaso
    De Rosa, Rita
    Venturini, Sergio
    Crapis, Massimo
    PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 25
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies: an Italian experience
    Infantino, Maria
    Grossi, Valentina
    Lari, Barbara
    Bambi, Riccardo
    Perri, Alessandro
    Manneschi, Matteo
    Terenzi, Giovanni
    Liotti, Irene
    Ciotta, Giovanni
    Taddei, Cristina
    Benucci, Maurizio
    Casprini, Patrizia
    Veneziani, Francesca
    Fabbri, Sergio
    Pompetti, Adolfo
    Manfredi, Mariangela
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (09) : 1671 - 1675
  • [23] Clinical Performance of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assay
    Tang, Mei San
    Hock, Karl G.
    Logsdon, Nicole M.
    Hayes, Jennifer E.
    Gronowski, Ann M.
    Anderson, Neil W.
    Farnsworth, Christopher W.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 66 (08) : 1107 - 1109
  • [24] Kinetics and performance of the Abbott architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assay
    Hamilton, Fergus
    Muir, Peter
    Attwood, Marie
    Vipond, Alan Noela Barry
    Hopes, Richard
    Moran, Ed
    Maskell, Nick
    Warwick, Deborah
    Albur, Mahableshwar
    Turner, Jonathan
    MacGowan, Alasdair
    Arnold, David
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2020, 81 (06) : E7 - E9
  • [25] Evaluation of the correlation between the access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test
    Kitagawa, Yutaro
    Imai, Kazuo
    Matsuoka, Masaru
    Fukada, Ai
    Kubota, Katsumi
    Sato, Momoko
    Takada, Tomohito
    Noguchi, Sakiko
    Tarumoto, Norihito
    Maesaki, Shigefumi
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Maeda, Takuya
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 94 (01) : 335 - 341
  • [26] A novel method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG based on the gold immune chromatography assay
    Yao, Xiaoqin
    Xu, Hao
    Du, Qin
    Lu, Xiaolan
    Wang, Qiang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [27] Diagnostic performance of a SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM lateral flow immunochromatography assay in symptomatic patients presenting to the emergency department
    Bernasconi, Luca
    Oberle, Michael
    Gisler, Valentin
    Ottiger, Cornelia
    Fankhauser, Hans
    Schuetz, Philipp
    Fux, Christoph A.
    Hammerer-Lercher, Angelika
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (09) : E159 - E161
  • [28] Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan
    Yokoyama, Rin
    Kurano, Makoto
    Morita, Yoshifumi
    Shimura, Takuya
    Nakano, Yuki
    Qian, Chungen
    Xia, Fuzhen
    He, Fan
    Kishi, Yoshiro
    Okada, Jun
    Yoshikawa, Naoyuki
    Nagura, Yutaka
    Okazaki, Hitoshi
    Moriya, Kyoji
    Seto, Yasuyuki
    Kodama, Tatsuhiko
    Yatomi, Yutaka
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [29] Accuracy of point-of-care diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgM/IgG) is heterogeneous
    Sacks, Henry S.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 173 (08) : JC47 - JC47
  • [30] Human IgM and IgG Responses to an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
    Jo-Lewis Banga Ndzouboukou
    Yan-di Zhang
    Qing Lei
    Xiao-song Lin
    Zong-jie Yao
    Hui Fu
    Le-yong Yuan
    Xiong-lin Fan
    Current Medical Science, 2021, 41 : 1081 - 1086