Distribution and Fate of Mercury in Pulverized Bituminous Coal-Fired Power Plants in Coal Energy-Dominant Huainan City, China

被引:18
|
作者
Chen, Bingyu [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Guijian [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Ruoyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, CAS Key Lab Crust Mantle Mat & Environm, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Earth Environm, State Key Lab Loess & Quaternary Geol, Xian 710075, Peoples R China
关键词
COMBUSTION BY-PRODUCTS; EMISSIONS; SPECIATION; ATMOSPHERE; POLLUTION; CHLORINE; SELENIUM; ELEMENTS; IMPACT; JAPAN;
D O I
10.1007/s00244-016-0267-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A better understanding on the partitioning behavior of mercury (Hg) during coal combustion in large-scale coal-fired power plants is fundamental for drafting Hg-emission control regulations. Two large coal-fired utility boilers, equipped with electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and a wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system, respectively, in coal energy-dominant Huainan City, China, were selected to investigate the distribution and fate of Hg during coal combustion. In three sampling campaigns, we found that Hg in bottom ash was severely depleted with a relative enrichment (RE) index < 7 %, whereas the RE index for fly ash (9-54 %) was comparatively higher and variable. Extremely high Hg was concentrated in gypsum (a parts per thousand currency sign4500 ng/g), which is produced in the WFGD system. Mass balance calculation shows that the shares of Hg in bottom ash, fly ash, WFGD products (gypsum, effluents, sludge), and stack emissions were < 2, 17-32, 7-22, and 54-82 %, respectively. The Hg-removal efficiencies of ESPs, WFGD, and ESPs + WFGD were 17-32, 10-29, and 36-46 %, respectively. The Hg-emission factor of studied boilers was in a high range of 0.24-0.29 g Hg/t coal. We estimated that Hg emissions in all Huainan coal-fired power plants varied from 1.8 Mg in 2003 to 7.3 Mg in 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 733
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China
    Maria Pia Ancora
    Lei Zhang
    Shuxiao Wang
    Jeremy Schreifels
    Jiming Hao
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 33 (07) : 125 - 134
  • [42] Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China
    Maria Pia Ancora
    Lei Zhang
    Shuxiao Wang
    Jeremy Schreifels
    Jiming Hao
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, (07) : 125 - 134
  • [43] Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China
    Ancora, Maria Pia
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Schreifels, Jeremy
    Hao, Jiming
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2015, 33 : 125 - 134
  • [44] Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal-fired power plants with SCR, CS-ESP and wet FGD
    Pudasainee, Deepak
    Kim, Jeong-Hun
    Yoon, Young-Sik
    Seo, Yong-Chil
    FUEL, 2012, 93 (01) : 312 - 318
  • [45] Prediction for the burnout of pulverized coal in a coal-fired power plant by combining proximate analysis, coal petrography, and pulverized-coal size distribution
    Xue, X.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2016, 38 (01) : 69 - 74
  • [46] Coal-fired plants emit most mercury
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2003, 81 (06) : 20 - 20
  • [47] Tribology in coal-fired power plants
    Moumakwa, DO
    Marcus, K
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 38 (09) : 805 - 811
  • [48] Coal-Fired Power Plants of Japan
    A. N. Tugov
    I. V. Artemeva
    Power Technology and Engineering, 2024, 58 (4) : 644 - 653
  • [49] Future coal-fired power plants
    Pruschek, R
    BWK, 2001, 53 (12): : 40 - +
  • [50] Advanced coal-fired power plants
    Ruth, LA
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01): : 4 - 9