International investment arbitration and the international fight against corruption

被引:0
|
作者
Valenzuela, Christian Carbajal [1 ]
Mendoza Neyra, Yolanda [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Lima, Lima, Peru
关键词
Corruption; international responsibility of States; international investment law; investment treaties; Anticorruption Clause; doctrine of clean hands; abuse of rights; general principle of international law; international investment arbitration; STATE RESPONSIBILITY; LAW; DOCTRINE; HANDS;
D O I
10.18800/derechopucp.202101.004
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Within international investment arbitrations, international protection is usually denied to investments that have been made through acts of corruption as the majority of the investment arbitration tribunals do not assume jurisdiction or the claims are considered inadmissible. These decisions, inevitably and indirectly, lead to the exoneration of international responsibility of the defendant States due to the corruption of their public officials, even when these illicit acts are not configured unilaterally, existing, in most cases, shared responsibility between the investor and the State. By not sanctioning corruption, the current crisis in the investment dispute resolution system is aggravated, which, on the contrary, requires urgent and consensual solutions to guarantee a viable reform. Faced with this worrying scenario, this article examines mechanisms to achieve the confluence between International Investment Law, International Z Anti-Corruption Law and the international standards concerning the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. We argue that if illicit behavior by public officials is found, depending on the circumstances of each case, the investment arbitration tribunals should rule on the international responsibility of the defendant States for failing to comply with the obligations arising from the International Anti-Corruption and Investment Treaties. Likewise, depending on the case, they must sanction investors and States, since both parties may be responsible for committing the illicit acts of corruption. Recognizing the limitations inherent to the powers of arbitral tribunals, it is possible to affirm that they cannot remain outside the international fight against corruption, as it has been agreed by the international community in the treaties that exist on this matter, being this the situation when the tribunals declare their lack of jurisdiction, avoiding to decide on the acts of corruption identified within the specific case.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 143
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration
    Langford, Malcolm
    Behn, Daniel
    Lie, Runar Hilleren
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2017, 20 (02) : 301 - 331
  • [32] Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration
    Ketcheson, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF WORLD INVESTMENT & TRADE, 2019, 20 (04): : 619 - 624
  • [33] Contributory Fault in International Investment Arbitration
    Burgstaller, Markus
    Galagan, Dmytro
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2024, 41 (04):
  • [34] The Element of Risk in International Investment Arbitration
    Kaldunski, Marcin
    INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY LAW REVIEW, 2011, 13 (1-2) : 111 - 124
  • [35] CURRENT TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
    Brockova, Katarina
    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2013: CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF WORLD ECONOMICS AND POLITICS, VOLS 1-4, 2013, : 103 - 104
  • [36] Mass claims in international investment arbitration
    Ksenofontov, K. E.
    VESTNIK OF SAINT PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY-LAW-VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-PRAVO, 2022, 13 (02): : 396 - 414
  • [38] The Diversity Deficit in International Investment Arbitration
    Bjorklund, Andrea K.
    Behn, Daniel
    Franck, Susan D.
    Giorgetti, Chiara
    Kidane, Won
    de Nanteuil, Arnaud
    Onyema, Emilia
    JOURNAL OF WORLD INVESTMENT & TRADE, 2020, 21 (2-3): : 410 - 440
  • [39] Abuse of Process in International Investment Arbitration
    Ascensio, Herve
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2014, 13 (04) : 763 - 785
  • [40] Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration
    Coe, Jack J., Jr.
    ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2019, 34 (01) : 241 - 254