International investment arbitration and the international fight against corruption

被引:0
|
作者
Valenzuela, Christian Carbajal [1 ]
Mendoza Neyra, Yolanda [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Lima, Lima, Peru
关键词
Corruption; international responsibility of States; international investment law; investment treaties; Anticorruption Clause; doctrine of clean hands; abuse of rights; general principle of international law; international investment arbitration; STATE RESPONSIBILITY; LAW; DOCTRINE; HANDS;
D O I
10.18800/derechopucp.202101.004
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Within international investment arbitrations, international protection is usually denied to investments that have been made through acts of corruption as the majority of the investment arbitration tribunals do not assume jurisdiction or the claims are considered inadmissible. These decisions, inevitably and indirectly, lead to the exoneration of international responsibility of the defendant States due to the corruption of their public officials, even when these illicit acts are not configured unilaterally, existing, in most cases, shared responsibility between the investor and the State. By not sanctioning corruption, the current crisis in the investment dispute resolution system is aggravated, which, on the contrary, requires urgent and consensual solutions to guarantee a viable reform. Faced with this worrying scenario, this article examines mechanisms to achieve the confluence between International Investment Law, International Z Anti-Corruption Law and the international standards concerning the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. We argue that if illicit behavior by public officials is found, depending on the circumstances of each case, the investment arbitration tribunals should rule on the international responsibility of the defendant States for failing to comply with the obligations arising from the International Anti-Corruption and Investment Treaties. Likewise, depending on the case, they must sanction investors and States, since both parties may be responsible for committing the illicit acts of corruption. Recognizing the limitations inherent to the powers of arbitral tribunals, it is possible to affirm that they cannot remain outside the international fight against corruption, as it has been agreed by the international community in the treaties that exist on this matter, being this the situation when the tribunals declare their lack of jurisdiction, avoiding to decide on the acts of corruption identified within the specific case.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 143
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] International Standards in the Fight Against Corruption: Asset Recovery
    Manea, A.
    UNIFORMIZATION OF THE LAW - LEGAL EFFECTS AND SOCIAL, POLITICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS, 2014, : 729 - 733
  • [12] The European Union and the fight against corruption in international trade
    Draetta, U
    WORKING ACROSS CULTURES: ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR INTERCULTURAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 9 : 73 - 91
  • [13] Values and interests: International legalization in the fight against corruption
    Abbott, KW
    Snidal, D
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2002, 31 (01): : S141 - S178
  • [14] Dealing with Corruption Allegations in International Investment Arbitration: Reaching a Procedural Consensus?
    Kendra, Thomas
    Bonini, Anna
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2014, 31 (04): : 439 - 453
  • [15] Accountability and Transparency to Fight against Corruption: An International Comparative Analysis
    Brusca, Isabel
    Rossi, Francesca Manes
    Aversano, Natalia
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2018, 20 (05): : 486 - 504
  • [16] Dealing with Allegations of Corruption in International Arbitration
    Low, Lucinda A.
    AJIL UNBOUND, 2019, 113 : 341 - 345
  • [17] PROVING CORRUPTION: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PERSPECTIVE
    Pivoda, Marek
    Zabloudilova, Katerina
    COFOLA INTERNATIONAL 2018, 2018, 633 : 60 - 86
  • [18] The Standard of Proof for Corruption in International Arbitration
    Bishara, Assad
    MANCHESTER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2019, 16 (03): : 441 - 470
  • [19] International legal instruments to fight against corruption and related crimes in Brazil
    Florencio Filho, Marco Aurelio
    Zanon, Patricie Barricelli
    Cunha Medeiros, Thamara Duarte
    CADERNOS DE DEREITO ACTUAL, 2019, (12): : 400 - 413
  • [20] The fight against corruption in international trade: challenges and prospects for WTO rules
    de Oliveira Silveira, Luciana Dutra
    Kotzias, Fernanda Vieira
    MERIDIANO 47-JOURNAL OF GLOBAL STUDIES, 2016, 17