"Which Came First: The Chicken or the Egg?" Ditransitive and Passive Constructions in the English Production of Simultaneous Bilingual English Children

被引:5
|
作者
Sanchez-Calderon, Silvia [1 ]
Fernandez-Fuertes, Raquel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Language Acquisit Lab, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain
关键词
ditransitives; double object constructions; to/for-dative structures; passives; bilingual acquisition; input; DOUBLE OBJECTS; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.28914/Atlantis-2018-40.1.02
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article aims to shed light on the syntactic status attributed to ditransitive constructions double object construction (DOC) and to/for-dative with respect to which type of structure is syntactically transformed through a process analogous to that of passives. We will do so by providing an analysis of the ditransitives and passives that appear in the English production of a set of English/Spanish simultaneous bilingual twins. Our results show that DOCs start being produced earlier than to/for-datives. However, the age of onset of passives differs in the children though it is consistently produced later than ditransitives. Likewise, adult input goes hand in hand with the children's production of ditransitives and passives since the high frequency of DOCs in this input, as opposed to the low frequency of to/for-datives and passives, is reflected in child output. These findings thus suggest that to/for-datives could be said to be derived from DOCs although, given the later acquisition of passives, no firm conclusions can be drawn as to whether this is done via a passive-like process.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 58
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Commentary: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Causality and spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma
    Wolf, Andrea S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 166 (05): : 1329 - 1330
  • [42] Visit-to-visit Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness: Which Came First: The Chicken or the Egg?
    Miyauchi, Shunsuke
    Nagai, Michiaki
    Dote, Keigo
    Kato, Masaya
    Oda, Noboru
    Kunita, Eiji
    Kagawa, Eisuke
    Yamane, Aya
    Higashihara, Tasuku
    Takeuchi, Arinori
    Tsuchiya, Akane
    Takahari, Kosuke
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2019, 25 (06) : 685 - 692
  • [43] Amyloid deposits and inflammatory infiltrates in sporadic inclusion body myositis: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
    Benveniste, O.
    NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2013, 23 (9-10) : 796 - 796
  • [44] Chronic prostatitis and related psychological problems. Which came first: The chicken or the egg? A systematic review
    Stamatiou, Konstantinos
    Trinchieri, Margherita
    Trinchieri, Martina
    Perletti, Gianpaolo
    Magri, Vittorio
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2023, 95 (01)
  • [45] Posterior reversible encephalopathy and Guillain–Barré syndrome: which came first, the chicken or the egg? A review of literature
    Benedetta Storti
    Marcella Vedovello
    Riccardo Riva
    Emanuela Agazzi
    Bruno Censori
    Ornella Manara
    Maria Sessa
    Maria Rosa Rottoli
    Neurological Sciences, 2020, 41 : 3663 - 3666
  • [46] Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? COMMENT
    Petronio, A. Sonia
    Giannini, Cristina
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (06) : 614 - 617
  • [47] Role of Tumor Vessels' Features in Determining Risk of Bleeding in Meningiomas: Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?
    Broggi, Morgan
    Restelli, Francesco
    Acerbi, Francesco
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 95 : 590 - 593
  • [48] Serum bicarbonate levels, kidney injury progression, and overall survival: which came first, the chicken or the egg?
    Cozzo, Domenico
    Merkel, Nathalie
    Bellasi, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 56 (11) : 3679 - 3681
  • [49] Posterior subgluteal approach to block the sciatic nerve: the controversy of 'which came first, the chicken or the egg' is alive
    Singh, B
    Sharma, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (06) : 496 - 496