"Which Came First: The Chicken or the Egg?" Ditransitive and Passive Constructions in the English Production of Simultaneous Bilingual English Children

被引:5
|
作者
Sanchez-Calderon, Silvia [1 ]
Fernandez-Fuertes, Raquel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Language Acquisit Lab, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain
关键词
ditransitives; double object constructions; to/for-dative structures; passives; bilingual acquisition; input; DOUBLE OBJECTS; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.28914/Atlantis-2018-40.1.02
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article aims to shed light on the syntactic status attributed to ditransitive constructions double object construction (DOC) and to/for-dative with respect to which type of structure is syntactically transformed through a process analogous to that of passives. We will do so by providing an analysis of the ditransitives and passives that appear in the English production of a set of English/Spanish simultaneous bilingual twins. Our results show that DOCs start being produced earlier than to/for-datives. However, the age of onset of passives differs in the children though it is consistently produced later than ditransitives. Likewise, adult input goes hand in hand with the children's production of ditransitives and passives since the high frequency of DOCs in this input, as opposed to the low frequency of to/for-datives and passives, is reflected in child output. These findings thus suggest that to/for-datives could be said to be derived from DOCs although, given the later acquisition of passives, no firm conclusions can be drawn as to whether this is done via a passive-like process.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 58
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of metformin on insulin resistance in heart failure. Which came first: the chicken or the egg?
    Lexis, Chris P. H.
    van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
    Lipsic, Erik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2012, 14 (11) : 1197 - 1198
  • [32] Functional Gallbladder Dyskinesia and Pathological Finding of Gallbladder Microlithiasis: Which Came First - The Chicken or the Egg?
    Linn, Sandar
    Stanca, Carmen
    Ona, Mel A.
    Lopez-Morra, Hernan
    Seo, In Suk
    Anand, Sury
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S755 - S755
  • [33] WHICH CAME FIRST, THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG? ENRIC PRAT DE LA RIBA AND CATALAN NATIONALITY
    Sosa-Velasco, Fredo J.
    HISPANOFILA, 2009, (157): : 175 - 191
  • [34] Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and ischemic heart disease. Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Cervellin, Gianfranco
    Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (07) : 456 - 463
  • [35] WHICH CAME FIRST, THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG? HIGH DEGREE AV BLOCK AND TAKOSTUBO'S CARDIOMYOPATHY
    Ashine, A.
    Berger, M.
    Malmsten, C.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 62 (04) : 704 - 704
  • [36] The molecular changes driving the carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
    Russo, A.
    Bronte, G.
    Cabibi, D.
    Bazan, V.
    Cicero, G.
    Bertani, A.
    Rizzo, S.
    Fiorentino, E.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 86 (03) : 278 - 289
  • [37] Which came first, the chicken device or the textual egg? Documentary film and the limits of the hybrid metaphor
    Dorst, JD
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE, 1999, 112 (445) : 268 - 281
  • [38] Bempedoic Acid and Statins in Lipid-Lowering Strategy: Which Came First, the Egg or the Chicken?
    Natale, Francesco
    Molinari, Riccardo
    Franzese, Rosa
    Mollo, Noemi
    Cimmino, Giovanni
    FUTURE PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 3 (02): : 392 - 406
  • [39] English Narrative Macrostructure Development of Spanish-English Bilingual Children From Preschool to First Grade
    Bitetti, Dana
    Hammer, Carol Scheffner
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2021, 30 (03) : 1100 - 1115
  • [40] Is there any difference between 'She gave a book to her daughter' and 'she gave her daughter a book'? English-Spanish bilingual children's acquisition of ditransitive constructions
    Sanchez Calderon, Silvia
    CURRENT WORK IN CORPUS LINGUISTICS: WORKING WITH TRADITIONALLY- CONCEIVED CORPORA AND BEYOND (CILC2015), 2015, 198 : 409 - 416