Selecting Usability Evaluation Methods for Software Process Descriptions

被引：3

作者：

Mahrin, Mohd Naz'ri ^{[1
]}

Strooper, Paul ^{[2
]}

Carrington, David ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, FSKSM, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia

[2] Univ Queensland, Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

来源：

APSEC 09: SIXTEENTH ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS | 2009年

关键词：

usability evaluation methods; software process descriptions; evaluation criteria;

D O I：

10.1109/APSEC.2009.33

中图分类号：

TP31 [计算机软件];

学科分类号：

081202 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

Reviewing many usability evaluation methods (UEMs) can he challenging and so selecting the appropriate UEM for a particular context, such as software process descriptions (SPDs), is difficult. Consequently, systematic analysis of UEMs based on a reusable set of evaluation criteria and strategies is essential. In this paper, we employ the feature analysis - screening mode of the DESMET methodology to analyse a range of UEMs and to suggest several UEM candidates for evaluating the usability of SPD.

引用

页码：523 / +

页数：3

共 50 条

[41] Software usability: Pros and cons of various methods and procedures
Salaschek, Martin
Holling, Heinz
Freund, Philipp Alexander
Kuhn, Joerg-Tobias
[J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 2007, (02): : 247 - +
[42] Complementary methods of system usability evaluation: Surveys and observations during software design and development cycles
Horsky, Jan
Mc Colgan, Kerry
Pang, Justine E.
Melnikas, Andrea J.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
Schnipper, Jeffrey L.
Middleton, Blackford
[J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2010, 43 (05) : 782 - 790
[43] Usability evaluation based on international standards for software quality evaluation
Toshihiro, Komiyama
[J]. NEC TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 3 (02): : 27 - 32
[44] Towards a Usability Model for Software Development Process and Practice
Fontdevila, Diego
Genero, Marcela
Oliveros, Alejandro
[J]. PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (PROFES 2017), 2017, 10611 : 137 - 145
[45] Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods
Hornbaek, Kasper
[J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 29 (01) : 97 - 111
[46] Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods
Hartson, HR
Andre, RS
Williges, RC
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2001, 13 (04) : 373 - 410
[47] If Usability Evaluation and Software Performance Evaluation Shook Their Hands: A Perspective
Di Mascio, Tania
Tarantino, Laura
De Gasperis, Giovanni
[J]. PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROFES 2015, 2015, 9459 : 479 - 489
[48] Tracking the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods
Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, United States
[J]. Behav Inf Technol, 4-5 (188-202):
[49] Analysis of Website Usability Evaluation Methods
Kaur, Sukhpuneet
Kaur, Kulwant
Kaur, Parminder
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIACOM - 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 1043 - 1046
[50] Tracking the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods
John, BE
Marks, SJ
[J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 16 (4-5) : 188 - 202

← 1 2 3 4 5 →