Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods

被引:133
|
作者
Hartson, HR
Andre, RS
Williges, RC
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA USA
[2] USAF, Res Lab, Washington, DC 20330 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_03
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The current variety of alternative approaches to usability evaluation. methods UEMs) designed to assess and improve usability in software systems is offset by a general lack of understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each. Practitioners need to know which methods are more effective and in what ways and for what purposes. However, UEMs cannot be evaluated and compared reliably because of the lack of standard criteria for comparison. In this article, we present a practical discussion of factors, comparison criteria, and UEM performance measures useful in studies comparing UEMs. In demonstrating the importance of developing appropriate UEM evaluation criteria, we offer operational definitions and possible measures of UEM performance. We highlight specific challenges that researchers and practitioners face in comparing UEMs and provide a point of departure for further discussion and refinement of the principles and techniques used to approach UEM evaluation and comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 410
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating usability evaluation methods: Criteria, method and a case study
    Koutsabasis, P.
    Spyrou, T.
    Darzentas, J.
    [J]. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS: INTERACTION DESIGN AND USABILITY, 2007, 4550 : 569 - +
  • [2] Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods (vol 13, pg 373, 2001)
    Hartson, HR
    Andre, TS
    Williges, RC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2003, 15 (01) : 145 - 181
  • [3] The effectiveness of usability evaluation methods: Determining the appropriate criteria
    Andre, TS
    Williges, RC
    Hartson, HR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43RD ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 1090 - 1094
  • [4] A comparison of usability evaluation methods for evaluating e-commerce websites
    Hasan, Layla
    Morris, Anne
    Probets, Steve
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 31 (07) : 707 - 737
  • [5] Usability evaluation methods
    Scapin, DL
    Berns, T
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 16 (4-5) : 185 - 187
  • [6] Comparison of two heuristic evaluation methods for evaluating the usability of health information systems
    Khajouei, Reza
    Gohari, Sadrieh Hajesmaeel
    Mirzaee, Moghaddameh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 80 : 37 - 42
  • [7] Assessment of Usability Evaluation Methods
    Riihiaho, Sirpa
    [J]. ECCE 2009 - EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS: DESIGNING BEYOND THE PRODUCT - UNDERSTANDING ACTIVITY AND USER EXPERIENCE IN UBIQUITOUS ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 258 : 434 - 437
  • [8] Comparison of heuristic and cognitive walkthrough usability evaluation methods for evaluating health information systems
    Khajouei, Reza
    Esfahani, Misagh Zahiri
    Jahani, Yunes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (E1) : E55 - E60
  • [9] APPLICATION OF EXPERT EVALUATION METHODS IN DETERMINING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CRITERIA FOR USABILITY OF RAILWAY TRACTION ROLLING STOCK
    Maskeliunaite, Lijana
    Meilus, Laurynas
    Sivilevicius, Henrikas
    [J]. TRANSPORT, 2023, 38 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [10] Methods for evaluating the usability of Web-based systems
    Benbunan-Fich, R
    [J]. ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMCIS 1999), 1999, : 868 - 870