Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods

被引:133
|
作者
Hartson, HR
Andre, RS
Williges, RC
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA USA
[2] USAF, Res Lab, Washington, DC 20330 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_03
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The current variety of alternative approaches to usability evaluation. methods UEMs) designed to assess and improve usability in software systems is offset by a general lack of understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each. Practitioners need to know which methods are more effective and in what ways and for what purposes. However, UEMs cannot be evaluated and compared reliably because of the lack of standard criteria for comparison. In this article, we present a practical discussion of factors, comparison criteria, and UEM performance measures useful in studies comparing UEMs. In demonstrating the importance of developing appropriate UEM evaluation criteria, we offer operational definitions and possible measures of UEM performance. We highlight specific challenges that researchers and practitioners face in comparing UEMs and provide a point of departure for further discussion and refinement of the principles and techniques used to approach UEM evaluation and comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 410
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods
    Johnsen, Fredrik Moltu
    Lokke, Soren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (04): : 840 - 849
  • [32] METHODS AND CRITERIA OF EVALUATING ACTIVE EXCHANGE IN COPEPODS
    PETIPA, TS
    OKEANOLOGIYA, 1984, 24 (05): : 831 - 835
  • [33] Criteria and methods of evaluating the durability of the sealing materials
    Serebrennikova, N.D.
    Stroitel'nye Materialy, 2003, (12): : 22 - 24
  • [34] Contrasting usability evaluation methods with blind users
    Mei Miao
    Hoai Anh Pham
    Jens Friebe
    Gerhard Weber
    Universal Access in the Information Society, 2016, 15 : 63 - 76
  • [35] Generalized criteria for evaluating hotspot identification methods
    Guo, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Lingtao
    Lord, Dominique
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 145
  • [36] METHODS AND CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING GINGIVAL TISSUE REACTIONS
    ZANDER, HA
    KENNEDY, J
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 1970, 20 (03) : 493 - &
  • [37] Evaluating Proteomics Imputation Methods with Improved Criteria
    Harris, Lincoln
    Fondrie, William E.
    Oh, Sewoong
    Noble, William S.
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2023, 22 (11) : 3427 - 3438
  • [38] Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods
    Fredrik Moltu Johnsen
    Søren Løkke
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 840 - 849
  • [39] Digital usability evaluation methods for work space
    Wang, Qiuhui
    Liu, Yajun
    Yang, Aihui
    International Review on Computers and Software, 2012, 7 (01) : 252 - 256
  • [40] A comparative analysis of heuristic and usability evaluation methods
    Simeral, EJ
    Branaghan, RJ
    SOCIETY FOR TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION 44TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 1997 PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 307 - 309