Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment

被引:10
|
作者
Hellen-Halme, Kristina [1 ]
Johansson, Curt [1 ]
Nilsson, Mats [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Phys, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
E-SPEED FILM; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHS; APPROXIMAL CARIES; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2016.01.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 10 individual sensors of the same make, using objective measures of key image quality parameters. A further aim was to compare 8 brands of sensors. Study Design. Ten new sensors of 8 different models from 6 manufacturers (i.e., 80 sensors) were included in the study. All sensors were exposed in a standardized way using an X-ray tube voltage of 60 kVp and different exposure times. Sensor response, noise, low-contrast resolution, spatial resolution and uniformity were measured. Results. Individual differences between sensors of the same brand were surprisingly large in some cases. There were clear differences in the characteristics of the different brands of sensors. The largest variations were found for individual sensor response for some of the brands studied. Also, noise level and low contrast resolution showed large variations between brands. Conclusions. Sensors, even of the same brand, vary significantly in their quality. It is thus valuable to establish action levels for the acceptance of newly delivered sensors and to use objective image quality control for commissioning purposes and periodic checks to ensure high performance of individual digital sensors.
引用
收藏
页码:E129 / E137
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] General recommendations for quality assessment of X-ray diagnostic equipment performance
    Moscow Scientific-Research Institute for Diagnostics and Surgery
    Biomed. Eng., 5 (252-254):
  • [32] Assessment of Absorbed Dose and Image Quality Using Cone Beam CT On An X-Ray Angiography System
    Supanich, M.
    Vanderhoek, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [33] Image quality assessment of a photon counting detector in X-ray projection imaging
    Ghani, Muhammad U.
    Li, Yuhua
    Wu, Xizeng
    Liu, Hong
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2019, 939 : 83 - 88
  • [34] Image quality and accuracy in x-ray microtomography
    Davis, GR
    DEVELOPMENTS IN X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY II, 1999, 3772 : 147 - 155
  • [35] Image quality simulations in X-ray mammography
    Di Maria, S.
    Oliva, P.
    Bottigli, U.
    Carpinelli, M.
    Golosio, B.
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA B-BASIC TOPICS IN PHYSICS, 2009, 124 (02): : 205 - 222
  • [36] An image quality assessment index based on image features and keypoints for X-ray CT images
    Maruyama, Sho
    Watanabe, Haruyuki
    Shimosegawa, Masayuki
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [37] A Comparison of X-Ray Image Segmentation Techniques
    Stolojescu-Crisan, Cristina
    Holban, Stefan
    ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2013, 13 (03) : 85 - 92
  • [38] Comparison of human observer impression of X-ray fluoroscopy and angiography image quality with technical changes to image quality
    Mihailovic, Jelena M.
    Kanaji, Yoshihisa
    Miller, Daniel
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Fetterly, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 11 (04)
  • [39] Compression and smart coding of offset and gain maps for intraoral digital x-ray sensors
    Frosio, I.
    Borghese, N. A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (02) : 464 - 479
  • [40] Predicting Detection Performance on Security X-Ray Images as a Function of Image Quality
    Gupta, Praful
    Sinno, Zeina
    Glover, Jack L.
    Paulter, Nicholas G., Jr.
    Bovik, Alan C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2019, 28 (07) : 3328 - 3342