Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment

被引:10
|
作者
Hellen-Halme, Kristina [1 ]
Johansson, Curt [1 ]
Nilsson, Mats [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Phys, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
E-SPEED FILM; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHS; APPROXIMAL CARIES; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2016.01.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 10 individual sensors of the same make, using objective measures of key image quality parameters. A further aim was to compare 8 brands of sensors. Study Design. Ten new sensors of 8 different models from 6 manufacturers (i.e., 80 sensors) were included in the study. All sensors were exposed in a standardized way using an X-ray tube voltage of 60 kVp and different exposure times. Sensor response, noise, low-contrast resolution, spatial resolution and uniformity were measured. Results. Individual differences between sensors of the same brand were surprisingly large in some cases. There were clear differences in the characteristics of the different brands of sensors. The largest variations were found for individual sensor response for some of the brands studied. Also, noise level and low contrast resolution showed large variations between brands. Conclusions. Sensors, even of the same brand, vary significantly in their quality. It is thus valuable to establish action levels for the acceptance of newly delivered sensors and to use objective image quality control for commissioning purposes and periodic checks to ensure high performance of individual digital sensors.
引用
收藏
页码:E129 / E137
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contrast curves of five different intraoral X-ray sensors: a technical note
    Bruellmann, Dan Dominik
    Kempkes, Benedikt
    d'Hoedt, Bernd
    Schulze, Ralf
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 115 (06): : E55 - E61
  • [22] An image quality prediction model for optimization of x-ray system performance
    Boutenko, V
    Klausz, R
    Nevin, R
    Tokman, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 831 - 833
  • [23] Performance criteria for x-ray imaging sensors
    Fröjdh, C
    Nelvig, P
    PHYSICA MEDICA, 1998, 14 : 10 - 12
  • [24] Quality enhancement of image intensified x-ray image
    Kuroki, K
    Kurosawa, K
    Saitoh, N
    Konuma, H
    INVESTIGATIVE IMAGE PROCESSING, 1997, 2942 : 105 - 111
  • [25] Amorphous silicon TFT X-ray image sensors
    Weisfield, RL
    INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING 1998 - TECHNICAL DIGEST, 1998, : 21 - 24
  • [26] Development of flat panel X-ray image sensors
    Izumi, Y.
    Teranuma, O.
    Sato, T.
    Uehara, K.
    Okada, H.
    Tokuda, S.
    Sato, T.
    Shapu Giho/Sharp Technical Journal, 2001, (80): : 25 - 30
  • [27] X-ray techniques for quality assessment
    Andersen, K
    QUALITY OF FISH FROM CATCH TO CONSUMER: LABELLING, MONITORING AND TRACEABILITY, 2003, : 283 - 286
  • [28] X-ray optimised CMOS image sensors for the Auroral X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (AXIS)
    Crews, Chiaki
    Buggey, Thomas W.
    Jones, Lawrence S.
    Endicott, James
    Holland, Andrew D.
    X-RAY, OPTICAL, AND INFRARED DETECTORS FOR ASTRONOMY XI, 2024, 13103
  • [29] Intraoral panoramic X-ray study
    Patrakhov, N.N.
    Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, 2001, (05): : 38 - 40