The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment

被引:261
|
作者
Rotz, C. A. [1 ]
Montes, F. [1 ]
Chianese, D. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] ENVIRON Int Corp, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA
关键词
greenhouse gas; carbon footprint; farm model; DairyGHG; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; METHANE EMISSIONS; MILK-PRODUCTION; ENERGY; SIMULATION; ETHANOL; FARMS; MODEL; SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2009-2162
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their potential effect on the environment has become an important national and international issue. Dairy production, along with all other types of animal agriculture, is a recognized source of GHG emissions, but little information exists on the net emissions from dairy farms. Component models for predicting all important sources and sinks of CH4, N2O, and CO2 from primary and secondary sources in dairy production were integrated in a software tool called the Dairy Greenhouse Gas model, or DairyGHG. This tool calculates the carbon footprint of a dairy production system as the net exchange of all GHG in CO2 equivalent units per unit of energy-corrected milk produced. Primary emission sources include enteric fermentation, manure, cropland used in feed production, and the combustion of fuel in machinery used to produce feed and handle manure. Secondary emissions are those occurring during the production of resources used on the farm, which can include fuel, electricity, machinery, fertilizer, pesticides, plastic, and purchased replacement animals. A longterm C balance is assumed for the production system, which does not account for potential depletion or sequestration of soil carbon. An evaluation of dairy farms of various sizes and production strategies gave carbon footprints of 0.37 to 0.69 kg of CO2 equivalent units/kg of energy-corrected milk, depending upon milk production level and the feeding and manure handling strategies used. In a comparison with previous studies, DairyGHG predicted C footprints similar to those reported when similar assumptions were made for feeding strategy, milk production, allocation method between milk and animal coproducts, and sources of CO2 and secondary emissions. DairyGHG provides a relatively simple tool for evaluating management effects on net GHG emissions and the overall carbon footprint of dairy production systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1282
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determining the Carbon Footprint of Tree Production System Components in Field Nurseries using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Ingram, Dewayne L.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2013, 48 (09) : S216 - S216
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment to Study the Carbon Footprint of System Components for Colorado Blue Spruce Field Production and Use
    Ingram, Dewayne L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2013, 138 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [43] Carbon footprint in Latin American dairy systems
    Velarde-Guillen, Jose
    Arndt, Claudia
    Gomez, Carlos A.
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [44] Carbon footprint in Latin American dairy systems
    José Velarde-Guillén
    Claudia Arndt
    Carlos A. Gómez
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54
  • [45] Sustainability Evaluation of a Concrete Gravity Dam: Life Cycle Assessment, Carbon Footprint Analysis, and Life Cycle Costing
    Mostafaei, Hasan
    Keshavarz, Zahra
    Ali Rostampour, Muhammad
    Mostofinejad, Davood
    Wu, Chengqing
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 53 : 279 - 295
  • [46] The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment
    Messagie, Maarten
    Mertens, Jan
    Oliveira, Luis
    Rangaraju, Surendraprabu
    Sanfelix, Javier
    Coosemans, Thierry
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Macharis, Cathy
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 469 - 476
  • [47] Assessing the carbon footprint of a university campus using a life cycle assessment approach
    Clabeaux, Raeanne
    Carbajales-Dale, Michael
    Ladner, David
    Walker, Terry
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273
  • [48] Carbon Footprint and Life-Cycle Costs of Maize Production in Conventional and Non-Inversion Tillage Systems
    Holka, Malgorzata
    Bienkowski, Jerzy
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [49] ASSESSMENT OF THE PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT OF OFFICE EQUIPMENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE LIFE CYCLE
    Wojciechowski, Hubert
    Domanski, Roman
    ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 89 (02):
  • [50] Carbon Footprint Analysis of Distribution Network Transformers Based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Wang, Yanpeng
    Zhang, Haiyang
    Zhou, Erbiao
    Xie, Lirong
    Li, Juan
    ENERGIES, 2025, 18 (03)