The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment

被引:261
|
作者
Rotz, C. A. [1 ]
Montes, F. [1 ]
Chianese, D. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] ENVIRON Int Corp, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA
关键词
greenhouse gas; carbon footprint; farm model; DairyGHG; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; METHANE EMISSIONS; MILK-PRODUCTION; ENERGY; SIMULATION; ETHANOL; FARMS; MODEL; SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2009-2162
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their potential effect on the environment has become an important national and international issue. Dairy production, along with all other types of animal agriculture, is a recognized source of GHG emissions, but little information exists on the net emissions from dairy farms. Component models for predicting all important sources and sinks of CH4, N2O, and CO2 from primary and secondary sources in dairy production were integrated in a software tool called the Dairy Greenhouse Gas model, or DairyGHG. This tool calculates the carbon footprint of a dairy production system as the net exchange of all GHG in CO2 equivalent units per unit of energy-corrected milk produced. Primary emission sources include enteric fermentation, manure, cropland used in feed production, and the combustion of fuel in machinery used to produce feed and handle manure. Secondary emissions are those occurring during the production of resources used on the farm, which can include fuel, electricity, machinery, fertilizer, pesticides, plastic, and purchased replacement animals. A longterm C balance is assumed for the production system, which does not account for potential depletion or sequestration of soil carbon. An evaluation of dairy farms of various sizes and production strategies gave carbon footprints of 0.37 to 0.69 kg of CO2 equivalent units/kg of energy-corrected milk, depending upon milk production level and the feeding and manure handling strategies used. In a comparison with previous studies, DairyGHG predicted C footprints similar to those reported when similar assumptions were made for feeding strategy, milk production, allocation method between milk and animal coproducts, and sources of CO2 and secondary emissions. DairyGHG provides a relatively simple tool for evaluating management effects on net GHG emissions and the overall carbon footprint of dairy production systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1282
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life-Cycle Assessment of Carbon Footprint of Bike-Share and Bus Systems in Campus Transit
    Wang, Sishen
    Wang, Hao
    Xie, Pengyu
    Chen, Xiaodan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [32] Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment
    Llorens, Berta
    Pomar, Candido
    Goyette, Bernard
    Rajagopal, Rajinikanth
    Andretta, Ines
    Latorre, Maria Angeles
    Remus, Aline
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102
  • [33] Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options
    Naranjo, Anna M.
    Sieverding, Heidi
    Clay, David
    Kebreab, Ermias
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [34] Assessment of the carbon footprint of four commercial dairy production systems in Australia using an integrated farm system model
    Sejian, Veerasamy
    Prasadh, R. Shyaam
    Lees, Angela M.
    Lees, Jarrod C.
    Al-Hosni, Yaqoub A. S.
    Sullivan, Megan L.
    Gaughan, John B.
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (01) : 57 - 70
  • [35] Life cycle assessment of pasture-based dairy production systems: Current and future performance
    Herron, Jonathan
    O'Brien, Donal
    Shalloo, Laurence
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (07) : 5849 - 5869
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of dairy production systems in Inner Mongolia: reiterate LCA modeling approaches
    Wu, Susie Ruqun
    Liu, Xinchao
    Wang, Lulu
    Xin, Xiaoping
    Chen, Jiquan
    Shao, Changliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (08): : 1670 - 1686
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of dairy production systems in Inner Mongolia: reiterate LCA modeling approaches
    Susie Ruqun Wu
    Xinchao Liu
    Lulu Wang
    Xiaoping Xin
    Jiquan Chen
    Changliang Shao
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1670 - 1686
  • [38] A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in the Andalusian Autochthonous Dairy Goat Production Systems
    Mancilla-Leyton, Juan Manuel
    Morales-Jerrett, Eduardo
    Munoz-Valles, Sara
    Mena, Yolanda
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (18):
  • [39] Life-cycle Carbon Footprint Assessment and Techno-economic Analysis of Integrated Energy Production Unit
    Yu Q.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhao Q.
    Sun L.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2024, 44 (08): : 3115 - 3124
  • [40] Examining the carbon footprint of rice production and consumption in Hubei, China: A life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis approach
    Zhang, Lu
    Ruiz-Menjivar, Jorge
    Tong, Qingmeng
    Zhang, Junbiao
    Yue, Meng
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 300