Population Biology and Comparative Genomics of Campylobacter Species

被引:4
|
作者
Epping, Lennard [1 ]
Antao, Esther-Maria [2 ]
Semmler, Torsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Robert Koch Inst, Microbial Genom, Nordufer 20, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Robert Koch Inst, Nordufer 20, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
SEQUENCE TYPING SYSTEM; WIDE ASSOCIATION; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY; JEJUNI COLONIZATION; GENETIC DIVERSITY; LARGE OUTBREAK; COLI STRAINS; HOST; UPSALIENSIS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-65481-8_3
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter is the leading cause for bacterial foodborne infections in humans. Campylobacters are most commonly transmitted via the consumption of undercooked poultry meat or raw milk products. The decreasing costs of whole genome sequencing enabled large genome-based analyses of the evolution and population structure of this pathogen, as well as the development of novel high-throughput molecular typing methods. Here, we review the evolutionary development and the population diversity of the two most clinically relevant Campylobacter species; C. jejuni and C. coli. The state-of-the-art phylogenetic studies showed clustering of C. jejuni lineages into host specialists and generalists with coexisting lifestyles in chicken and livestock-associated hosts, as well as the separation of C. coli isolates of riparian origin (waterfowl, water) from C. coli isolated from clinical and farm-related samples. We will give an overview of recombination between both species and the potential impact of horizontal gene transfer on host adaptation in Campylobacter. Additionally, this review briefly places the current knowledge of the population structure of other Campylobacter species such as C. lari, C. concisus and C. upsaliensis into perspective. We also provide an overview of how molecular typing methods such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole genome MLST have been used to detect and trace Campylobacter outbreaks along the food chain.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 78
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics
    Han, Mira V.
    Zmasek, Christian M.
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10
  • [32] Comparative genomics of pectinacetylesterases: Insight on function and biology
    de Souza, Amancio Jose
    Pauly, Markus
    [J]. PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 10 (09)
  • [33] Population biology, genomics, and epidemiology, of bacterial pathogens
    Maiden, M. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 296 : 61 - 61
  • [34] PRIMATE CONSERVATION THROUGH COMPARATIVE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF 2 LEMUR SPECIES
    DOPSON, AP
    MERENLENDER, AM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1990, 81 (02) : 216 - 216
  • [35] Comparative Genomics of Four Mustelid Species
    Belfiore, N. M.
    Noordsij, L. C.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 59 : E271 - E271
  • [36] Comparative Chloroplast Genomics in Phyllanthaceae Species
    Rehman, Umar
    Sultana, Nighat
    Abdullah
    Jamal, Abbas
    Muzaffar, Maryam
    Poczai, Peter
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (09):
  • [37] Comparative genomics and the nature of placozoan species
    Eitel, Michael
    Francis, Warren R.
    Varoqueaux, Frederique
    Daraspe, Jean
    Osigus, Hans-Juergen
    Krebs, Stefan
    Vargas, Sergio
    Blum, Helmut
    Williams, Gray A.
    Schierwater, Bernd
    Woerheide, Gert
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2018, 16 (07)
  • [38] Comparative population genomics in Tabebuia alliance shows evidence of adaptation in Neotropical tree species
    Vieira, Lucas D.
    Silva-Junior, Orzenil B.
    Novaes, Evandro
    Collevatti, Rosane G.
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2022, 128 (03) : 141 - 153
  • [39] Comparative population genomics in Tabebuia alliance shows evidence of adaptation in Neotropical tree species
    Lucas D. Vieira
    Orzenil B. Silva-Junior
    Evandro Novaes
    Rosane G. Collevatti
    [J]. Heredity, 2022, 128 : 141 - 153
  • [40] Evolutionary Species in Light of Population Genomics
    Sterner, Beckett
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2019, 86 (05) : 1087 - 1098