Artifact reduction in contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:10
|
作者
Gennaro, Gisella [1 ]
Baldan, Enrica [1 ]
Bezzon, Elisabetta [1 ]
Caumo, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Breast Imaging Unit, Via Gattamelata 64, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
Mammography; Contrast agent; Artifact; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-022-01211-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a new algorithm developed to reduce artifacts in dual-energy subtraction (DES) contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images while preserving contrast enhancement of possible lesions. Methods A retrospective multi-reader paired study was performed by using 134 CEM studies obtained from the first 134 women enrolled in a prospective clinical study aiming to compare the clinical performance of CEM to those of breast MRI in screening of women at increased risk of breast cancer. Four experienced readers compared independently the standard (STD) DES images with those obtained by reprocessing the raw images by a new algorithm (NEW), expected to reduce the DES artifact intensity. The intensity of three types of artifacts (breast-in-breast, ripple, and skinfold enhancement) and the intensity of possible contrast uptake were assessed visually and rated using a categorical ordinal scale. Proportions of images rated by the majority of readers as "Absent", "Weak", "Medium", "Strong" in each artifact intensity category were compared between the two algorithms. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The NEW algorithm succeeded in eliminating 84.5% of breast-in-breast artifacts, 84.2% of ripple artifacts, and 56.9% of skinfold enhancement artifacts versus STD DES images, and reduced the artifact intensity in 12.1%, 13.0%, and 28.8% of the images, respectively. The visibility of lesion contrast uptake was the same with the STD and the NEW algorithms. Conclusion The new dual-energy subtraction algorithm demonstrated to be effective in reducing/eliminating CEM-related artifacts while preserving lesion contrast enhancement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Successful Clinical Experience
    Woodroof, Andrea
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (11)
  • [32] Contrast-enhanced mammography and tumour size assessment
    Mascarel, Anne-Margaux
    Movassaghi, Roshanack
    Neveu, Marine
    Vilcot, Laurence
    Geffroy, Delphine
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 164 - 167
  • [33] Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography
    Goh, Y.
    Quek, S. T.
    Pillay, P.
    Chou, C. -P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (03) : 163 - 169
  • [34] Dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography
    Travieso Aja, M. M.
    Rodriguez Rodriguez, M.
    Mayon Hernandez, S.
    Vega Benitez, V.
    Luzardo, O. P.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2014, 56 (05): : 390 - 399
  • [35] Quantitative Breast Density in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Hill, Melissa L.
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    Caumo, Francesca
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (15)
  • [36] State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography
    Covington, Matthew F.
    Salmon, Samantha
    Weaver, Bradley D.
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1156): : 695 - 704
  • [37] Structured reports for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Alvarez Sanchez, C.
    Arizaga Ramirez, M. C.
    Montes Fernandez, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2022, 64 : 98 - 105
  • [38] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging
    Lancaster, Rachael B.
    Gulla, Shannon
    De Los Santos, Jennifer
    Umphrey, Heidi R.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening
    Coffey, Kristen
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 156
  • [40] Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future
    Sogani, Julie
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Keating, Delia
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 69 : 269 - 279