Artifact reduction in contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:10
|
作者
Gennaro, Gisella [1 ]
Baldan, Enrica [1 ]
Bezzon, Elisabetta [1 ]
Caumo, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Breast Imaging Unit, Via Gattamelata 64, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
Mammography; Contrast agent; Artifact; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-022-01211-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a new algorithm developed to reduce artifacts in dual-energy subtraction (DES) contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images while preserving contrast enhancement of possible lesions. Methods A retrospective multi-reader paired study was performed by using 134 CEM studies obtained from the first 134 women enrolled in a prospective clinical study aiming to compare the clinical performance of CEM to those of breast MRI in screening of women at increased risk of breast cancer. Four experienced readers compared independently the standard (STD) DES images with those obtained by reprocessing the raw images by a new algorithm (NEW), expected to reduce the DES artifact intensity. The intensity of three types of artifacts (breast-in-breast, ripple, and skinfold enhancement) and the intensity of possible contrast uptake were assessed visually and rated using a categorical ordinal scale. Proportions of images rated by the majority of readers as "Absent", "Weak", "Medium", "Strong" in each artifact intensity category were compared between the two algorithms. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The NEW algorithm succeeded in eliminating 84.5% of breast-in-breast artifacts, 84.2% of ripple artifacts, and 56.9% of skinfold enhancement artifacts versus STD DES images, and reduced the artifact intensity in 12.1%, 13.0%, and 28.8% of the images, respectively. The visibility of lesion contrast uptake was the same with the STD and the NEW algorithms. Conclusion The new dual-energy subtraction algorithm demonstrated to be effective in reducing/eliminating CEM-related artifacts while preserving lesion contrast enhancement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The emerging role of contrast-enhanced mammography
    Cozzi, Andrea
    Schiaffino, Simone
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2019, 9 (12) : 2012 - 2018
  • [22] Contrast-enhanced mammography: better with AI?
    Tianyu Zhang
    Ritse M. Mann
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 914 - 916
  • [23] Contrast-enhanced mammography: Technical considerations
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Arfi-Rouche, Julia
    Loshkajian, Ara
    Ceugnart, Luc
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 133 - 138
  • [24] Pearls and Pitfalls of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Phillips, Jordana
    Fein-Zachary, Valerie J.
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2019, 1 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Lobbes, Marc B., I
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) : 36 - 48
  • [26] Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment Comparison of contrast-enhanced
    Huang, Hailiang
    Scaduto, David A.
    Liu, Chunling
    Yang, Jie
    Zhu, Chencan
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Eisenberg, Jason
    Liu, Jingxuan
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Wicklein, Julia
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [27] Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Lewin, John
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (02) : 259 - +
  • [28] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Comparison With MRI and Mammography
    Yuzkan, Sabahattin
    Cengiz, Duygu
    Hekimsoy, Ilhan
    Okcu, Ozlem Sezgin
    Oktay, Aysenur
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (04) : 448 - 454
  • [29] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: How Does It Work?
    Sensakovic, William F.
    Carnahan, Molly B.
    Czaplicki, Christopher D.
    Fahrenholtz, Samuel
    Panda, Anshuman
    Zhou, Yuxiang
    Pavlicek, William
    Patel, Bhavika
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2021, 41 (03) : 829 - 839
  • [30] Detection of Primary Malignancy With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Chen, Shao Zun
    Nguyen, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (01) : 96 - 98