Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load

被引:39
|
作者
Gao, Ya [1 ,2 ]
Theeuwes, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Van der Boechorststr 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] iBBA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Attentional capture; Visual search; Working memory; Statistical regularities; TOP-DOWN; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL-SEARCH; MIND; INTERFERENCE; REGULARITIES; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-019-01679-6
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Where and what we attend to is not only determined by our current goals but also by what we have encountered in the past. Recent studies have shown that people learn to extract statistical regularities in the environment resulting in attentional suppression of high-probability distractor locations, effectively reducing capture by a distractor. Here, we asked whether this statistical learning is dependent on working memory resources. The additional singleton task in which one location was more likely to contain a distractor was combined with a concurrent visual working memory task (Experiment 1) and a spatial working memory task (Experiment 2). The result showed that learning to suppress this high-probability location was not at all affected by working memory load. We conclude that learning to suppress a location is an implicit and automatic process that does not rely on visual or spatial working memory capacity, nor on executive control resources. We speculate that extracting regularities from the environment likely relies on long-term memory processes.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 104
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load
    Ya Gao
    Jan Theeuwes
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 96 - 104
  • [2] Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory
    Koshino, Hideya
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2017, 172 : 19 - 25
  • [3] Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing
    Koshino, Hideya
    Olid, Pilar
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 142 (03): : 135 - 149
  • [4] Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load
    Zhe Chen
    Celestien C. Chan
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 306 - 312
  • [5] Temporal attention is not affected by working memory load
    Zanto, Theodore P.
    Liu, Helen
    Pan, Peter
    Gazzaley, Adam
    CORTEX, 2020, 130 : 351 - 361
  • [6] Working Memory Load Modulates Distractor Competition in Primary Visual Cortex
    Kelley, Todd A.
    Lavie, Nilli
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2011, 21 (03) : 659 - 665
  • [7] Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load
    Chen, Zhe
    Chan, Celestien C.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (02) : 306 - 312
  • [8] Learning to suppress a distractor may not be unconscious
    Francisco Vicente-Conesa
    Tamara Giménez-Fernández
    David Luque
    Miguel A. Vadillo
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2023, 85 : 796 - 813
  • [9] Learning to suppress a distractor may not be unconscious
    Vicente-Conesa, Francisco
    Gimenez-Fernandez, Tamara
    Luque, David
    Vadillo, Miguel A.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2023, 85 (03) : 796 - 813
  • [10] Distractor filtering and task load in working memory training in healthy older adults
    Geiter, Emanuel
    Mazreku, Gresa
    Foresti, Martina
    Magon, Stefano
    de Quervain, Dominique J. -F.
    Zuber, Priska
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):