Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load

被引:39
|
作者
Gao, Ya [1 ,2 ]
Theeuwes, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Van der Boechorststr 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] iBBA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Attentional capture; Visual search; Working memory; Statistical regularities; TOP-DOWN; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL-SEARCH; MIND; INTERFERENCE; REGULARITIES; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-019-01679-6
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Where and what we attend to is not only determined by our current goals but also by what we have encountered in the past. Recent studies have shown that people learn to extract statistical regularities in the environment resulting in attentional suppression of high-probability distractor locations, effectively reducing capture by a distractor. Here, we asked whether this statistical learning is dependent on working memory resources. The additional singleton task in which one location was more likely to contain a distractor was combined with a concurrent visual working memory task (Experiment 1) and a spatial working memory task (Experiment 2). The result showed that learning to suppress this high-probability location was not at all affected by working memory load. We conclude that learning to suppress a location is an implicit and automatic process that does not rely on visual or spatial working memory capacity, nor on executive control resources. We speculate that extracting regularities from the environment likely relies on long-term memory processes.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 104
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning
    Manginelli, Angela A.
    Langer, Nadine
    Klose, Diana
    Pollmann, Stefan
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (06) : 1103 - 1117
  • [42] Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning
    Angela A. Manginelli
    Nadine Langer
    Diana Klose
    Stefan Pollmann
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013, 75 : 1103 - 1117
  • [43] Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search
    Alex Bahrami Balani
    David Soto
    Glyn W. Humphreys
    Memory & Cognition, 2010, 38 : 1058 - 1076
  • [44] Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor
    Yan, Minmin
    Tian, Yanying
    Hai, Min
    Zhang, Bohua
    Chen, Antao
    PSYCH JOURNAL, 2024, 13 (05) : 717 - 725
  • [45] Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
    Ding, Lin-Jie
    Zhang, Shao-Shuai
    Peng, Ming
    Li, Xu
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [46] Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search
    Balani, Alex Bahrami
    Soto, David
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (08) : 1058 - 1076
  • [47] Developmental changes in brain activation related to working memory and distractor processing
    Olesen, PJ
    Macoveanu, J
    Klingberg, T
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 109 - 109
  • [48] Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
    Lin-jie Ding
    Shao-shuai Zhang
    Ming Peng
    Xu Li
    BMC Psychology, 10
  • [49] Neural basis of distractor resistance during visual working memory maintenance
    Hermann, Petra
    Weiss, Bela
    Knakker, Balazs
    Madurka, Petra
    Manga, Annamaria
    Narai, Adam
    Vidnyanszky, Zoltan
    NEUROIMAGE, 2021, 245
  • [50] ATTENDING TO AUDITORY WORKING MEMORY REPRESENTATIONS: TARGET FACILITATION OR DISTRACTOR SUPPRESSION?
    Klatt, Laura-Isabelle
    Getzmann, Stephan
    Begau, Alexandra
    Schneider, Daniel
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 : S24 - S24