Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory

被引:5
|
作者
Koshino, Hideya [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, 5500 Univ Pkwy, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
关键词
Attention; Working memory; Perceptual load; Distractor interference; VISUAL-SEARCH; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DILUTION; INFORMATION; MECHANISMS; SALIENCE; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Working memory and attention are closely related. Recent research has shown that working memory can be viewed as internally directed attention. Working memory can affect attention in at least two ways. One is the effect of working memory load on attention, and the other is the effect of working memory contents on attention. In the present study, an interaction between working memory contents and perceptual load in distractor processing was investigated. Participants performed a perceptual load task in a standard form in one condition (Single task). In the other condition, a response-related distractor was maintained in working memory, rather than presented in the same stimulus display as a target (Dual task). For the Dual task condition, a significant compatibility effect was found under high perceptual load; however, there was no compatibility effect under low perceptual load. These results suggest that the way the contents of working memory affect visual search depends on perceptual load. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing
    Koshino, Hideya
    Olid, Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 142 (03): : 135 - 149
  • [2] Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load
    Ya Gao
    Jan Theeuwes
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 96 - 104
  • [3] Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load
    Gao, Ya
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (01) : 96 - 104
  • [4] Developmental changes in brain activation related to working memory and distractor processing
    Olesen, PJ
    Macoveanu, J
    Klingberg, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 109 - 109
  • [5] Visual working-memory capacity load does not modulate distractor processing
    Nailang Yao
    Yang Guo
    Yang Liu
    Mowei Shen
    Zaifeng Gao
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 3291 - 3313
  • [6] Visual working-memory capacity load does not modulate distractor processing
    Yao, Nailang
    Guo, Yang
    Liu, Yang
    Shen, Mowei
    Gao, Zaifeng
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (07) : 3291 - 3313
  • [7] Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search
    Alex Bahrami Balani
    David Soto
    Glyn W. Humphreys
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2010, 38 : 1058 - 1076
  • [8] Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search
    Balani, Alex Bahrami
    Soto, David
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (08) : 1058 - 1076
  • [9] Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor and conflict processing in a name-face Stroop task
    Jongen, Ellen M. M.
    Jonkman, Lisa M.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [10] Decoding of Working Memory Contents in Auditory Cortex Is Not Distractor-Resistant
    Deutsch, Philipp
    Czoschke, Stefan
    Fischer, Cora
    Kaiser, Jochen
    Bledowski, Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 43 (18): : 3284 - 3293