Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces

被引:23
|
作者
Paulu, David [1 ]
Alaei, Parham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiat Oncol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
关键词
algorithms; prosthesis; treatment planning; PELVIC IRRADIATION; CT; RADIOTHERAPY; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12060
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double-prosthesis. Modern treatment planning systems employ algorithms with improved dose calculation accuracies but even these algorithms may not predict the dose accurately at high atomic number interfaces. The current study evaluates the dose calculation accuracy of three common dose calculation algorithms employed in two commercial treatment planning systems. A hip prosthesis was molded inside a cylindrical phantom and the dose at several points within the phantom at the interface with prosthesis was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The measured doses were then compared to the predicted ones by the planning systems. The results of the study indicate all three algorithms underestimate the dose at the prosthesis interface, albeit to varying degrees, and for both low-and high-energy x rays. The measured doses are higher than calculated ones by 5-22% for Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm, 2-23% for Eclipse Acuros XB, and 6-25% for Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. There are generally better agreements for AXB algorithm and the worst results are for the AAA.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of a Commercial Treatment Planning System Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small Static Fields
    Bustos, L. Maduro
    Chang, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E703 - E703
  • [32] The accuracy of different dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning of patients with small lung tumors
    Wiezorek, T.
    Fippel, M.
    Salz, H.
    Schwedas, M.
    Wendt, T. G.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S230 - S230
  • [33] Dose comparison between Gafchromic film, XiO, and Monaco treatment planning systems in a novel pelvic phantom that contains a titanium hip prosthesis
    Ade, Nicholas
    du Plessis, F. C. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 162 - 173
  • [34] Accuracy of volume and DVH calculation with seven modern brachytherapy treatment planning systems
    Kirisits, C.
    Siebert, F-A.
    Baltas, D.
    De Brabandere, M.
    Hellebust, T. Paulsen
    Berger, D.
    Venselaar, J. L. M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S94 - S95
  • [35] Accuracy of volume reconstruction and calculation with different external beam treatment planning systems
    Perez-Rozos, A.
    Calvo-Ortega, J. F.
    Lobato Munoz, M.
    Casals, J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S787 - S788
  • [36] Evaluation of IMRT Plans From Four Treatment Planning Systems Based On Independent Monte Carlo Dose Calculation
    Chi, Z.
    Cao, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Liu, D.
    Li, R.
    Qiu, R.
    Han, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [37] Evaluation of IMRT Plans From Three Treatment Planning Systems Based On Independent Monte Carlo Dose Calculation
    Chi, Z.
    Li, J.
    Jin, L.
    Fan, J.
    Lin, T.
    Xu, Q.
    Ma, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [38] Evaluation of the influence of contoured tops for different dose calculation algorithms in treatment planning
    Schneider, F.
    Bauer, L.
    Stieler, F.
    Lohr, F.
    Wenz, F.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 : 101 - 101
  • [39] Dose Calculation Comparisons Between Monaco, Pinnacle and Eclipse Treatment Planning Systems
    Bosse, C.
    Narayanasamy, G.
    Kirby, N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Stathakis, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3396 - 3397
  • [40] Evaluation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron treatment planning
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Dunkerley, David
    Smilowitz, Jennifer B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (06): : 184 - 193