Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces

被引:23
|
作者
Paulu, David [1 ]
Alaei, Parham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiat Oncol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
关键词
algorithms; prosthesis; treatment planning; PELVIC IRRADIATION; CT; RADIOTHERAPY; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12060
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double-prosthesis. Modern treatment planning systems employ algorithms with improved dose calculation accuracies but even these algorithms may not predict the dose accurately at high atomic number interfaces. The current study evaluates the dose calculation accuracy of three common dose calculation algorithms employed in two commercial treatment planning systems. A hip prosthesis was molded inside a cylindrical phantom and the dose at several points within the phantom at the interface with prosthesis was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The measured doses were then compared to the predicted ones by the planning systems. The results of the study indicate all three algorithms underestimate the dose at the prosthesis interface, albeit to varying degrees, and for both low-and high-energy x rays. The measured doses are higher than calculated ones by 5-22% for Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm, 2-23% for Eclipse Acuros XB, and 6-25% for Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. There are generally better agreements for AXB algorithm and the worst results are for the AAA.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Incomplete or Incorrect Beam Data On Treatment Planning Dose Calculation Accuracy
    Benson, C.
    Alaei, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E558 - E558
  • [22] Critical Comparison of Measured and Calculated Prostate Dose using Multiple Treatment Modalities and Planning Systems in a Phantom with Bilateral Hip Prosthesis
    Rakowski, J. T.
    Saini, J.
    Weyh, A.
    Starin, R.
    Kumar, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S737 - S737
  • [23] Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions
    Jonsson, Joakim H.
    Karlsson, Magnus G.
    Karlsson, Mikael
    Nyholm, Tufve
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5
  • [24] Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions
    Joakim H Jonsson
    Magnus G Karlsson
    Mikael Karlsson
    Tufve Nyholm
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 5
  • [25] Dosimetric Evaluation with Heterogeneity in Eclipse Treatment Planning Dose Calculation Algorithms
    Rana, S.
    Cheng, C.
    Hibbitts, K.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [26] Phantom Evaluation of Dose Calculation Accuracy Comparing BrainLab and Eclipse Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) for Brain Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) with Simulation and Film Dosimetry
    Yoon, J.
    Jung, H.
    Milano, M.
    Usuki, K.
    Hardy, S.
    Zheng, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E959 - E960
  • [27] Dose Calculation Comparisons between Three Modern Treatment Planning Systems
    Bosse, Courtney
    Narayanasamy, Ganesh
    Saenz, Daniel
    Myers, Pamela
    Kirby, Neil
    Rasmussen, Karl
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Papanikolaou, Niko
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 45 (03) : 143 - 147
  • [28] Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning
    Chamberland, Eve
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Lachance, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03): : 60 - 79
  • [29] Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems
    Venselaar, J
    Welleweerd, H
    Mijnheer, B
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [30] An Investigation of Heterogeneity Dose Calculation Accuracy in IMRT from Five Commercial Treatment Planning Systems Useing Monte Carlo
    Chi, Z.
    Liu, D.
    Cao, Y.
    Han, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)