Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour

被引:0
|
作者
Syed, Shazia [1 ]
Chaudhri, Rizwana [1 ]
Rizvi, Farwa [2 ]
Afzal, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Holy Family Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
[2] IMDC, Dept Community Med, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Coll Phys & Surg Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan
来源
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN | 2010年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
Oral misoprostol; Term pregnancy; Labour induction; Prostaglandins; Indication-to-delivery time interval; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; TRIAL; DINOPROSTONE; PROGRESSION; OXYTOCIN; SAFETY; TERM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the effect of oral Misoprostol in tabour induction with respect to ease of administration and induction-to-delivery time interval. Study Design: Observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynaecology/Obstetrics Department, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, from March to August 2006. Methodology: Women with live singleton pregnancy of > 37 weeks gestation with cephalic presentation, with an indication for induction of labour were inducted. Oral misoprostol 50 mu g to 400 mu g was given in divided doses at 4 hours interval upto a maximum of 4 doses, till labour was induced. Fetomaternal outcome and induction to delivering time interval in hours was noted. Results: In 6 months duration, 250 mothers were recruited for the study. The main indication for labour induction was post date pregnancy (52%) and oxytocin was given in 50% cases. The majority (96%) of mothers went into labour but 4% (9) had failed induction. The majority (73%, n=176/241) of mothers delivered vaginally, 99% being delivered in the first 24 hours. Mean induction-delivery interval was 11 +/- 2.7 hours. Sixty five (27%) had to undergo emergency lower segment caesarean section, the major indication being fetal distress (41.5%, n=27) and meconium staining of liquor (40%, n=26). Again, a majority (95%) of the babies were delivered with good Apgar score. However, 10.8% developed meconium aspiration syndrome. Early neonatal deaths occurred in 0.8% (2) cases. Maternal hyper stimulation was seen in 1 case (0.4%). Conclusion: Oral misoprostol as an agent for labour induction in term pregnancy was easy to administer and the majority of women (99%) delivered in the first 24 hours.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 105
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Misoprostol for induction of labour at term -: Reply
    Hofmeyr, GJ
    Gülmezoglu, AM
    Alfirevic, Z
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (04): : 576 - 577
  • [32] A STUDY ON INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR
    Sanaton, Ahanthembi
    Singh, Ng Indrakumar
    Thoibahenba, S.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (14): : 2219 - 2222
  • [34] MISOPROSTOL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR: THE HYDERABAD EXPERIENCE
    Memon, Amna
    Sikandar, Raheel
    JOURNAL OF THE LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 2007, 6 (02): : 56 - 59
  • [35] Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study
    Kehl, Sven
    Weiss, Christel
    Dammer, Ulf
    Heimrich, Jutta
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Suetterlin, Marc
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 204 : 78 - 82
  • [36] Oral misoprostol vs intra-cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction
    Kamal, Patil P.
    Swamy, M. K.
    Radhika, Rao K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (02): : 128 - 131
  • [37] Labour Induction With Randomized Comparison Of Oral And Intravaginal Misoprostol In Post Date Multigravida Women
    Ayaz, Aqueela
    Saeed, Shazia
    Farooq, Mian Usman
    Ahmad, Iftikhar
    Bahoo, Muhammad Luqman Ali
    Saeed, Muhammad
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (01): : 34 - 38
  • [38] A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction
    Mehrotra, S.
    Singh, U.
    Gupta, H. P.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 30 (05) : 461 - 464
  • [39] Comparison of Vaginal and Oral Doses of Misoprostol for Labour Induction in Post-Term Pregnancies
    Rezaie, Masomeh
    Farhadifar, Fariba
    Sadegh, Susan Mirza Mohammadi
    Nayebi, Morteza
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (03) : QC8 - QC11
  • [40] Oral vs vaginal misoprostol in the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Shetty, A
    Danielian, P
    Templeton, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (06): : 813 - 813