Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour

被引:0
|
作者
Syed, Shazia [1 ]
Chaudhri, Rizwana [1 ]
Rizvi, Farwa [2 ]
Afzal, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Holy Family Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
[2] IMDC, Dept Community Med, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Coll Phys & Surg Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan
来源
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN | 2010年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
Oral misoprostol; Term pregnancy; Labour induction; Prostaglandins; Indication-to-delivery time interval; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; TRIAL; DINOPROSTONE; PROGRESSION; OXYTOCIN; SAFETY; TERM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the effect of oral Misoprostol in tabour induction with respect to ease of administration and induction-to-delivery time interval. Study Design: Observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynaecology/Obstetrics Department, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, from March to August 2006. Methodology: Women with live singleton pregnancy of > 37 weeks gestation with cephalic presentation, with an indication for induction of labour were inducted. Oral misoprostol 50 mu g to 400 mu g was given in divided doses at 4 hours interval upto a maximum of 4 doses, till labour was induced. Fetomaternal outcome and induction to delivering time interval in hours was noted. Results: In 6 months duration, 250 mothers were recruited for the study. The main indication for labour induction was post date pregnancy (52%) and oxytocin was given in 50% cases. The majority (96%) of mothers went into labour but 4% (9) had failed induction. The majority (73%, n=176/241) of mothers delivered vaginally, 99% being delivered in the first 24 hours. Mean induction-delivery interval was 11 +/- 2.7 hours. Sixty five (27%) had to undergo emergency lower segment caesarean section, the major indication being fetal distress (41.5%, n=27) and meconium staining of liquor (40%, n=26). Again, a majority (95%) of the babies were delivered with good Apgar score. However, 10.8% developed meconium aspiration syndrome. Early neonatal deaths occurred in 0.8% (2) cases. Maternal hyper stimulation was seen in 1 case (0.4%). Conclusion: Oral misoprostol as an agent for labour induction in term pregnancy was easy to administer and the majority of women (99%) delivered in the first 24 hours.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 105
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the Effect of Obesity on Induction of Labour with Low Dose Oral Misoprostol
    Luoni, S.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 : 79 - 79
  • [22] A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomised trial
    Kwon, JS
    Davies, GAL
    Mackenzie, VP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (01): : 23 - 26
  • [23] Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
    Kehl, Sven
    Born, Tilman
    Weiss, Christel
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Pretscher, Jutta
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Dammer, Ulf
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 3
  • [24] Titrated oral misoprostol versus static regimen of oral misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Alshahrani, Majed Saeed
    Khadawardi, Khalid
    Badghish, Ehab
    Alkhamis, Waleed H.
    Mohamed, Doaa Fathy
    Kamal, Shaimaa Hanafy Moustafa
    Halim, Hala Waheed Abdel
    Alkholy, Eman A.
    Mohamed, Mariam Salah
    Mohamed, Asmaa Abdelaal
    Barakat, Shaimaa Ali
    Magdy, Hagar Abdelgawad
    Abd Elrehim, Eman Ibrahim
    Abdelhakim, Ahmed Mohamed
    Ragab, Bassem
    Elmazzaly, Saged Mohamed Metyli
    Ellaban, Mostafa
    Abbas, Ahmed M.
    Soror, Ghada Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (06) : 1653 - 1661
  • [25] Sublingual Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term
    Malik, Humaira Zaman
    Khawaja, Nuzhat Parveen
    Zahid, Bushra
    Rehman, Rakhshanda
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2010, 20 (04): : 242 - 245
  • [26] Comparative study of efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction or labour
    Deshmukh V.L.
    Yelikar K.A.
    Waso V.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2013, 63 (5) : 321 - 324
  • [27] Safety and Efficacy of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Use for Induction of Labour at Term
    Abbassi, Razia Mustafa
    Sirichand, Pushpa
    Rizvi, Sadaf
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2008, 18 (10): : 625 - 629
  • [28] Comparative Study of Oral and Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour Maternal and Foetal Outcome
    Komala, Kambhampati
    Reddy, Meherlatha
    Quadri, Igbal Jehan
    Suneetha, B.
    Ramya, V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2013, 7 (12) : 2866 - 2869
  • [29] Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomised controlled trial
    Shetty, A
    Mackie, L
    Danielian, P
    Rice, P
    Templeton, A
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (06) : 645 - 650
  • [30] Misoprostol for induction of labour:: a systematic review
    Hofmeyr, GJ
    Gülmezoglu, AM
    Alfirevic, Z
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (08): : 798 - 803