A Prophylactic Tibial Stem Reduces Rates of Early Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Severe Preoperative Varus Deformity in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:9
|
作者
Hegde, Vishal [1 ,2 ]
Bracey, Daniel N. [1 ,3 ]
Brady, Anna C. [1 ]
Kleeman-Forsthuber, Lindsay T. [1 ]
Dennis, Douglas A. [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Jennings, Jason M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Joint Replacement, 2535 S Downing St,Suite 100, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ Denver, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, Denver, CO USA
[6] Univ Tennessee, Dept Biomed Engn, Knoxville, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2021年 / 36卷 / 07期
关键词
varus deformity; total knee arthroplasty; tibial stem extension; aseptic loosening; preoperative alignment; PROXIMAL TIBIA; FOLLOW-UP; REVISION; COMPONENT; FIXATION; MALALIGNMENT; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.049
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients with a preoperative varus deformity >8 degrees are at increased risk of aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. This study analyzes the effect of a tibial stem on the rate of aseptic loosening in patients with a severe preoperative varus deformity. Methods: Patients with a preoperative varus deformity of >8 degrees and 2-year minimum follow-up with a stemmed tibial component (n = 67) were matched 1:2 to patients with a similar preoperative varus deformity with a standard tibial component (n = 134). Radiolucent lines were measured on the tibia at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. Failure was defined as revision due to aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-tests and log-rank tests. Results: Patients with tibial stems had greater preoperative deformity (12.9 vs 11.3 degrees, P = .004). There was no difference in postoperative alignment (1.7 vs 2.1 degrees varus, P = .25) or tibial component angle (1.8 vs 2.1 degrees varus, P = .33). Patients with stems were more likely to have more constraint (44.8% vs 1.5%, P <.001). Progression of radiolucent lines >2 mmwas observed in 17.6% (23/134) vs 5.97% (4/67) of patients in the stem group (P = .03). Rates of aseptic loosening were lower in the stem group (0% vs 5.15%, P = .05). Conclusion: Despite worse preoperative deformity and higher utilization of constraint, tibial stem use in patients with severe preoperative varus deformity resulted in lower rates of aseptic loosening. Prophylactic use of stems in these patients may help increase implant survival. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2319 / 2324
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The correction of severe varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty by tibial component downsizing and resection of uncapped proximal medial bone
    Dixon, MC
    Parsch, D
    Brown, RR
    Scott, RD
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (01): : 19 - 22
  • [22] The relationship between postoperative ligament balance and preoperative varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty
    Yagishita, K.
    Muneta, T.
    Yamamoto, H.
    Shinomiya, K.
    Bulletin: Hospital for Joint Diseases, 2001, 60 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [23] Reduced Aseptic Loosening With Fully Cemented Short-Stemmed Tibial Components in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Garceau, Simon P.
    Harris, Nathan H.
    Felberbaum, Dvorah L.
    Teo, Greg M.
    Weinblatt, Aaron, I
    Long, William J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06): : 1591 - +
  • [24] Can Isolated Tibial Component Revision Be an Alternative to Isolated Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2024, 12 (02): : 136 - 138
  • [25] Predicting the need for medial augmentation for primary total knee arthroplasty with varus deformity
    Demir, Ekin Baris
    Barca, Fatih
    Dincer, Abdullah
    Atilla, Halis Atil
    Akdogan, Mutlu
    Ates, Yalim
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2025, 36 (01): : 129 - 136
  • [26] Risk Factors for aseptic loosening after primary total knee arthroplasty with cemented knee implants
    Holy, Chantal E.
    Daccach, Juan
    Leopold, John
    Ray, Bidusee
    Coplan, Paul
    Hoeffel, Daniel
    Wright, John
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 350 - 350
  • [27] Poor outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with septic loosening compared to patients with aseptic loosening
    Baek, Ji-Hoon
    Lee, Su Chan
    Jin, Hosun
    Kim, Jin-Woo
    Ahn, Hye Sun
    Nam, Chang Hyun
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [28] Poor outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with septic loosening compared to patients with aseptic loosening
    Ji-Hoon Baek
    Su Chan Lee
    Hosun Jin
    Jin-Woo Kim
    Hye Sun Ahn
    Chang Hyun Nam
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16
  • [29] Does the use of tibial stem extensions reduce the risk of aseptic loosening in obese patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Yushy
    Rele, Siddharth
    Elsewaisy, Osama
    KNEE, 2024, 48 : 35 - 45
  • [30] Early Failure of Total Ankle Arthroplasty in a Patient with Ipsilateral Varus Knee Deformity
    Kim, Taehyeon
    Lee, Su Chan
    Nam, Chang Hyun
    Ryu, Suengryol
    Ahn, Hye Sun
    Baek, Ji-Hoon
    CASE REPORTS IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 2021