The surgical outcome of decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

被引:19
|
作者
Masuda, Kenji [1 ]
Higashi, Takayuki [1 ]
Yamada, Katsutaka [1 ]
Sekiya, Tatsuhiro [1 ]
Saito, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
degenerative lumbar scoliosis; decompression; short segmental fusion; criteria for intervertebral instability; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17879
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of radiological parameters for surgical decision-making in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by comparing the clinical and radiological results after decompression or decompression and fusion surgery. METHODS The authors prospectively planned surgical treatment for 298 patients with degenerative lumbar disease between September 2005 and March 2013. The surgical method used at their institution to address intervertebral instability is precisely defined based on radiological parameters. Among 64 patients with a Cobb angle ranging from 10 degrees to 25 degrees, 57 patients who underwent follow-up for more than 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those in the decompression group underwent decompression alone (n = 25), and those in the fusion group underwent decompression and short segmental fusion (n = 32). Surgical outcomes were reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, lumbar lordosis based on radiological parameters, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. RESULTS The JOA scores of the decompression group and fusion group improved from 5.9 +/- 1.6 to 10.0 +/- 2.8 and from 7.2 +/- 2.0 to 11.3 +/- 2.8, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups. At the final followup, the postoperative Cobb angle in the decompression group changed from 14 degrees +/- 2.9 degrees to 14.3 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees and remained stable, while the Cobb angle in the fusion group decreased from 14.8 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees to 10.0 degrees +/- 8.5 degrees after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The patients in both groups demonstrated improved JOA scores and preserved Cobb angles after surgery. The improvement in JOA scores and preservation of Cobb angles in both groups show that the evaluation of spinal instability using radiological parameters is appropriate for surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression
    Ball, Jacob R.
    Gallo, Matthew C.
    Kebaish, Kareem
    Hang, Nicole
    Ton, Andy
    Hernandez, Fergui
    Abdou, Marc
    Karakash, William J.
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Hah, Raymond J.
    Alluri, Ram K.
    NEUROSPINE, 2024, 21 (04)
  • [42] Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Natural history and results of simple decompression and decompression and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Bell, GR
    LOW BACK PAIN: A SCIENTIFIC AND CLINICAL OVERVIEW, 1996, : 663 - 675
  • [43] Consideration of foraminal stenosis in decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis
    Tee, Jin
    Li, Charles
    Chan, Patrick
    Etherington, Greg
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (05): : 830 - 830
  • [44] Comparison of Decompression Alone Versus Decompression with Fusion for Stenotic Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ahmed, Syed Ijlal
    Javed, Gohar
    Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish
    Shah, Ali
    Zubair, Maha
    Avedia, Rabbia Faisal.
    Rahman, Noor
    Samar, Syeda Sana
    Aziz, Kashif
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (08):
  • [45] Five-Year Outcomes After Decompression and Fusion Versus Decompression Alone in the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts
    Khalid, Syed I.
    Nie, James W.
    Thomson, Kyle B.
    Nie, Jeffrey Z.
    Patil, Shashank N.
    Zakrzewski, Victoria
    Souter, John
    Smith, Jennifer S.
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 166 : E23 - E33
  • [46] Decompression Alone in the Setting of Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Echt, Murray
    Ramos, Rafael De la Garza
    Geng, Eric
    Isleem, Ula
    Schwarz, Julia
    Girdler, Steven
    Platt, Andrew
    Bakare, Adewale A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (03) : 861 - 872
  • [47] Fusion versus decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking
    Unterfrauner, Ines
    Laguna, Javier Munoz
    Serra-Burriel, Miquel
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    Uckay, Ilker
    Farshad, Mazda
    Hincapie, Cesar A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (11) : 4281 - 4291
  • [48] Fusion versus decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking"
    Unterfrauner, Ines
    Laguna, Javier Munoz
    Hincapie, Cesar A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [49] Fusion versus decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking
    Iyer, R. Dinesh
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [50] Letter to the editor regarding "decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis": when do we have enough evidence?
    Gadjradj, Pravesh S.
    Sommer, Fabian
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022,