Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, WR
DeGuzman, AF
McMullen, KP
McCullough, DL
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
prostate brachytherapy; I-125; PSA; dosimetry;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D-90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V-100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and Materials: The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with I-125. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D-90, V-100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D-90 and V-100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D-90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D-90 was >140 Gy. The median V-100 was 81% (range, 51-97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80-90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D-90 were as follows: D-90 greater than or equal to 140 Gy, 86%; D-90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D-90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D-90 was <80 Gy (D-90 greater than or equal to80 Gy, 89%; D-90 <80 Gy, 50%;p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V-100 were as follows: V-100 2:85%, 87 %; V-100 <85 %, 84 % (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V-100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRITS was 89% if the V-100 was 2!65% compared with 40% if the V-100 was <65% (p = 0.006). Conclusion: The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low toxicity of focal low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for intermediate risk prostate cancer
    Harkin, Timothy
    Smyth, Lloyd
    Anderson, Elliot
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Ryan, Andrew
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Katz, Darren
    Grummet, Jeremy
    See, Andrew
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 : 76 - 76
  • [42] Small cell carcinoma of the prostate after low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a case report
    Eva Van Bos
    Peter Dekuyper
    Charlotte Gabriel
    Marjan Waterloos
    Anthony Van Baelen
    Stefan Huybrechts
    Filip Ameye
    Antoon Lambrecht
    Christof Vulsteke
    Charlotte Soenens
    [J]. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 14
  • [43] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is superior to high-dose-rate brachytherapy for bladder cancer
    Pos, FJ
    Horenblas, S
    Lebesque, J
    Moonen, L
    Schneider, C
    Sminia, P
    Bartelink, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (03): : 696 - 705
  • [44] Small cell carcinoma of the prostate after low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a case report
    Van Bos, Eva
    Dekuyper, Peter
    Gabriel, Charlotte
    Waterloos, Marjan
    Van Baelen, Anthony
    Huybrechts, Stefan
    Ameye, Filip
    Lambrecht, Antoon
    Vulsteke, Christof
    Soenens, Charlotte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [45] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer stands the test of time - the Swiss experience
    Langley, Stephen E. M.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (06) : 750 - 751
  • [46] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A 15-year experience in Japan
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    Asakawa, Isao
    Hasegawa, Masatoshi
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [47] Low-dose-rate Prostate Brachytherapy: Characterization of Seeds Dynamics within the Prostate
    Karius, A.
    Lotter, M.
    Kreppner, S.
    Lubgan, D.
    Grigo, J.
    Fietkau, R.
    Strnad, V.
    Bert, C.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 198 (SUPPL 1) : S118 - S119
  • [48] Role of external beam radiotherapy with low-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer
    Jani, AB
    Feinstein, JM
    Pasciak, R
    Krengel, S
    Weichselbaum, RR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (05) : 1007 - 1011
  • [49] Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Definitive Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy
    Ester, E. C.
    Wang, X.
    Vernon, M. R.
    Olson, N. J.
    Shanley, R. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S405 - S405
  • [50] Unexpected lower biochemical control of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost than low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Yoshida, Ken
    [J]. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 24 : 10 - 10