Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, WR
DeGuzman, AF
McMullen, KP
McCullough, DL
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
prostate brachytherapy; I-125; PSA; dosimetry;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D-90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V-100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and Materials: The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with I-125. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D-90, V-100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D-90 and V-100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D-90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D-90 was >140 Gy. The median V-100 was 81% (range, 51-97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80-90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D-90 were as follows: D-90 greater than or equal to 140 Gy, 86%; D-90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D-90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D-90 was <80 Gy (D-90 greater than or equal to80 Gy, 89%; D-90 <80 Gy, 50%;p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V-100 were as follows: V-100 2:85%, 87 %; V-100 <85 %, 84 % (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V-100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRITS was 89% if the V-100 was 2!65% compared with 40% if the V-100 was <65% (p = 0.006). Conclusion: The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of the feasibility of using transrectal ultrasound for postimplant dosimetry in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Davies, Rhian Sian
    Perrett, Teresa
    Powell, Jane
    Barber, Jim
    Tanguay, Jacob
    Button, Michael
    Cochlin, Dennis
    Smith, Christian
    Lester, Jason Francis
    [J]. Medical Dosimetry, 2016, 41 (04) : 290 - 295
  • [22] Radiation protection and dosimetry issues for patients with prostate cancer after I-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy permanent implant
    Licciardello, Tiziana
    Feliciani, Giacomo
    Mazzotti, Giorgio
    Mostacci, Domiziano
    Sarnelli, Anna
    Menghi, Enrico
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (01) : 272 - 278
  • [23] Focal application of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a pilot study
    Mandavi, S. Sara
    Spodinger, Ingrid T.
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    Kozlowski, Piotr
    Chang, Silvia D.
    Ng, Tony
    Lobo, Julio
    Nir, Guy
    Moradi, Hand
    Peacock, Michael
    Morris, W. James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 9 (03) : 197 - 208
  • [24] The Incidence of Second Malignancies Following Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Hamilton, S.
    Tyldesley, S.
    Hamm, J.
    Keyes, M.
    Pickles, T.
    Lapointe, V.
    Kahnamelli, A.
    McKenzie, M.
    Miller, S.
    Morris, W. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S424 - S425
  • [25] Role of androgen ablation with low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Shoushtari, Asal
    Feinstein, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2006, 26 (12) : 723 - 731
  • [26] The impact of trainee involvement on outcomes in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Shaikh, Talha
    Wang, Lora
    Ruth, Karen
    Hallman, Mark
    Chen, David Y.
    Greenberg, Richard E.
    Li, Jinsheng
    Crawford, Kevin
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 15 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [27] The oncologic and safety outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (03) : 127 - 133
  • [28] Comparison of 4 EBRTs and low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer
    Chang, K. H.
    Kim, D. W.
    Hong, C. S.
    Park, K. S.
    Byun, H. K.
    Kim, J.
    Han, M.
    Lee, H.
    Park, K.
    Kim, J. S.
    Cho, J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 141 : S7 - S7
  • [29] Role of Androgen Ablation with Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Ashesh B. Jani
    Asal Shoushtari
    Jeffrey M. Feinstein
    [J]. Clinical Drug Investigation, 2006, 26 : 723 - 731
  • [30] Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options
    Skowronek, Janusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 41