Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, WR
DeGuzman, AF
McMullen, KP
McCullough, DL
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
prostate brachytherapy; I-125; PSA; dosimetry;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D-90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V-100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB). Methods and Materials: The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with I-125. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D-90, V-100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D-90 and V-100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided. Results: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D-90 was 122 Gy (range, 57-171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D-90 was >140 Gy. The median V-100 was 81% (range, 51-97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6-38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80-90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D-90 were as follows: D-90 greater than or equal to 140 Gy, 86%; D-90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D-90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D-90 was <80 Gy (D-90 greater than or equal to80 Gy, 89%; D-90 <80 Gy, 50%;p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V-100 were as follows: V-100 2:85%, 87 %; V-100 <85 %, 84 % (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V-100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRITS was 89% if the V-100 was 2!65% compared with 40% if the V-100 was <65% (p = 0.006). Conclusion: The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetry Modeling for Focal Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar
    Mason, Josh
    Bownes, Peter
    Henry, Ann
    Dickinson, Louise
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Emberton, Mark
    Langley, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (04): : 787 - 793
  • [2] Sector analysis of dosimetry of prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Nasser, Nicola J.
    Wang, Yinkun
    Borg, Jette
    Saibishkumar, Elantholi P.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2014, 13 (04) : 369 - 374
  • [3] Cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy performed by a multidisciplinary team with no previous prostate brachytherapy experience
    McMullen, KP
    DeGuzman, AF
    McCullough, DL
    Lee, WR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (06) : 1128 - 1131
  • [4] Regional Quadrant Dosimetry and Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy
    Hamilton, S.
    Keyes, M.
    Moravan, V.
    Spadinger, I.
    Morris, W. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E189 - E190
  • [5] Urinary Retention and Incontinence after Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Leapman M.S.
    Stone N.N.
    [J]. Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, 2013, 8 (3) : 236 - 241
  • [6] Pulmonary Metastases After Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Kido, Masahito
    Kuruma, Hidetoshi
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Miki, Kenta
    Aoki, Manabu
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Takahash, Hiroyuki
    Kanehira, Chihiro
    Egawa, Shin
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (05) : 309 - 314
  • [7] Control charts for evaluation of quality of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Nasser, Nicola J.
    Saibishkumar, Elantholi P.
    Wang, Yinkun
    Chung, Peter W. M.
    Breen, Stephen L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (04) : 354 - 363
  • [8] Relapse patterns after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Lamb, David S.
    Greig, Lynne
    FitzJohn, Trevor
    Russell, Grant L.
    Nacey, John N.
    Iupati, Douglas
    Woods, Lisa
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [9] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-grade prostate cancer
    Raabe, Nils Kristian
    Normann, Marius
    Lilleby, Wolfgang
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (06) : 548 - 552
  • [10] Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer in Low Resource Settings
    Echevarria, M.
    Naghavi, A. O.
    Abuodeh, Y. A.
    Chevere, C. M.
    Yamoah, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E408 - E408