Life cycle environmental and economic analyses of a hydrogen station with wind energy

被引:58
|
作者
Lee, Ji-Yong [2 ]
An, Sanghyuk [1 ]
Cha, Kyounghoon [1 ]
Hur, Tak [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Dept Biol & Chem Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] LG Elect, Eco Strategy Team, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Wind energy; Hydrogen; LCA (life cycle assessment); LCC (life cycle costing);
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.082
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aimed to identify the environmental and economic aspects of the wind-hydrogen system using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The target H-2 pathways are the H-2 pathway of water electrolysis (WE) with wind power (WE[Wind]) and the H-2 pathway of WE by Korean electricity mix (WE[KEM]). Conventional fuels (gasoline and diesel) are also included as target fuel pathways to identify the fuel pathways with economic and environmental advantages over conventional fuels. The key environmental issues in the transportation sector are analyzed in terms of fossil fuel consumption (FFC), regulated air pollutants (RAPs), abiotic resource depletion (ARD), and global warming (GW). The life cycle costs of the target fuel pathways consist of the well-to-tank (WTT) costs and the tank-to-wheel (TTW) costs. Moreover, two scenarios are analyzed to predict potential economic and environmental improvements offered by wind energy-powered hydrogen stations. In LCA results, WE[Wind] is superior to the other pathways in all environmental categories. The LCC results show that the projected WTT cost savings of WE[Wind] and WE[KEM] compared to gasoline are US $ 0.050 and US $ 0.036 per MJ, respectively, because hydrogen will not be subjected to any fuel tax according to the Korean Energy Policy in 2015. Although WE[KEM] and WE [Wind] incur high capital costs owing to the required capital investment in fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), they have lower well-to-wheel (WTW) costs than those of conventional fuels due to the high FCV efficiency in fuel utilization stage. WTW costs for gasoline are higher than those of WE[KEM] and WE[Wind] by US $ 12,600 and US $ 10,200, respectively. This study demonstrated the future competitiveness of the WE[Wind] pathway in both environmental and economic aspects. In the WTT stage, the point-of-sale of the electricity produced by the wind power plant (WPP) cannot be controlled because the wind-powered electricity production fluctuates considerably depending on the wind. However, the use of a wind-powered H-2 station in the future enables stable wind power plant management and provides greater economic profit than the present system since the wind-powered electricity can be used for the hydrogen production in the H-2 station and any residual electricity is sold to Korea electric power corporation (KEPCO). If 5% of conventional vehicles in Korea are substituted with FCVs using H-2 via WE[Wind] in 2015, CO2 emission will be reduced by 2,876,000 tons/year and annual LCC costs by US $ 8559 million. Thus, the operation of wind-powered hydrogen stations will encourage the introduction of hydrogen into the transportation fuel market. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu.
引用
收藏
页码:2213 / 2225
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental and energy life cycle analyses of passenger vehicle systems using fossil fuel-derived hydrogen
    Hienuki, Shunichi
    Mitoma, Haruka
    Ogata, Mari
    Uchida, Izumi
    Kagawa, Shigemi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (73) : 36569 - 36580
  • [2] ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF WIND ENERGY INSTALLATIONS DURING THEIR LIFE CYCLE
    Boyko, T. H.
    Ruda, M. V.
    [J]. UKRAINIAN METROLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2020, (3A): : 67 - 71
  • [3] Energy analysis and environmental life cycle assessment of a micro-wind turbine
    Allen, S. R.
    Hammond, G. P.
    McManus, M. C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2008, 222 (A7) : 669 - 684
  • [4] Evaluation of a heat recovery steam cycle based on energy, exergy, environmental and economic analyses
    Mohammadi, Saeed
    Rad, Ehsan Amiri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 268 - 286
  • [5] Environmental life cycle analyses of transport systems
    Adams, VW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 1996, 17 (5-6) : 718 - 724
  • [6] Combining Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessments in Building Energy Renovation Projects
    Moschetti, Roberta
    Brattebo, Helge
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of methanol vehicles from energy, environmental and economic perspectives
    Luo, Lina
    Wang, Honglei
    Li, Chengjiang
    Hu, Yujie
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 5487 - 5500
  • [8] Life cycle reliability and maintenance analyses of wind turbines
    Chan, Daniel
    Mo, John
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND POWER, ICEP2016, 2017, 110 : 328 - 333
  • [9] Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: Life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance
    Keoleian, GA
    Volk, TA
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2005, 24 (5-6) : 385 - 406
  • [10] Hydrogen mobility from wind energy - A life cycle assessment focusing on the fuel supply
    Burkhardt, Joerg
    Patyk, Andreas
    Tanguy, Philippe
    Retzke, Carsten
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 181 : 54 - 64