Life cycle environmental and economic analyses of a hydrogen station with wind energy

被引:58
|
作者
Lee, Ji-Yong [2 ]
An, Sanghyuk [1 ]
Cha, Kyounghoon [1 ]
Hur, Tak [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Dept Biol & Chem Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] LG Elect, Eco Strategy Team, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Wind energy; Hydrogen; LCA (life cycle assessment); LCC (life cycle costing);
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.082
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aimed to identify the environmental and economic aspects of the wind-hydrogen system using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The target H-2 pathways are the H-2 pathway of water electrolysis (WE) with wind power (WE[Wind]) and the H-2 pathway of WE by Korean electricity mix (WE[KEM]). Conventional fuels (gasoline and diesel) are also included as target fuel pathways to identify the fuel pathways with economic and environmental advantages over conventional fuels. The key environmental issues in the transportation sector are analyzed in terms of fossil fuel consumption (FFC), regulated air pollutants (RAPs), abiotic resource depletion (ARD), and global warming (GW). The life cycle costs of the target fuel pathways consist of the well-to-tank (WTT) costs and the tank-to-wheel (TTW) costs. Moreover, two scenarios are analyzed to predict potential economic and environmental improvements offered by wind energy-powered hydrogen stations. In LCA results, WE[Wind] is superior to the other pathways in all environmental categories. The LCC results show that the projected WTT cost savings of WE[Wind] and WE[KEM] compared to gasoline are US $ 0.050 and US $ 0.036 per MJ, respectively, because hydrogen will not be subjected to any fuel tax according to the Korean Energy Policy in 2015. Although WE[KEM] and WE [Wind] incur high capital costs owing to the required capital investment in fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), they have lower well-to-wheel (WTW) costs than those of conventional fuels due to the high FCV efficiency in fuel utilization stage. WTW costs for gasoline are higher than those of WE[KEM] and WE[Wind] by US $ 12,600 and US $ 10,200, respectively. This study demonstrated the future competitiveness of the WE[Wind] pathway in both environmental and economic aspects. In the WTT stage, the point-of-sale of the electricity produced by the wind power plant (WPP) cannot be controlled because the wind-powered electricity production fluctuates considerably depending on the wind. However, the use of a wind-powered H-2 station in the future enables stable wind power plant management and provides greater economic profit than the present system since the wind-powered electricity can be used for the hydrogen production in the H-2 station and any residual electricity is sold to Korea electric power corporation (KEPCO). If 5% of conventional vehicles in Korea are substituted with FCVs using H-2 via WE[Wind] in 2015, CO2 emission will be reduced by 2,876,000 tons/year and annual LCC costs by US $ 8559 million. Thus, the operation of wind-powered hydrogen stations will encourage the introduction of hydrogen into the transportation fuel market. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu.
引用
收藏
页码:2213 / 2225
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The life-cycle energy and environmental emissions of a typical offshore wind farm in China
    Yang, Juhua
    Chang, Yuan
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Hao, Yan
    Yan, Qin
    Wang, Changbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 : 316 - 324
  • [12] Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines -: review and applications
    Lenzen, M
    Munksgaard, J
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2002, 26 (03) : 339 - 362
  • [13] Energy, environmental and economic life cycle assessment of hydrogen source via natural gas steam reforming for fuel cell vehicles
    Feng, W
    Wang, SJ
    Wan, W
    Zheng, XY
    Chen, CH
    Ni, WD
    Xu, XC
    [J]. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 405 - 410
  • [14] Environmental, social and economic aspects of wind energy
    Surugiu, L
    Paraschivoiu, I
    [J]. 35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 1167 - 1174
  • [15] Water-energy nexus in the combined cycle power plant using energy, exergy, economic and environmental analyses
    Kahe, Sadegh
    Sharif, Atefeh
    Joda, Fatemeh
    Avami, Akram
    Kianbakhsh, Alireza
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 293
  • [16] An audit of life cycle energy analyses of buildings
    Yung, Ping
    Lam, Ka Chi
    Yu, Chenyun
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 39 : 43 - 54
  • [17] Life Cycle Analysis on Economic Operation of Wind Farm
    Lue, Tai
    Wu, Wen-rui
    [J]. 2009 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), VOLS 1-7, 2009, : 855 - 858
  • [18] DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEMS DESIGN OPTIMIZATION BASED ON LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS
    Maharjan, Krisha
    Zhang, Jian
    Cho, Heejin
    Chen, Yang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, ES2022, 2022,
  • [19] Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies
    Mills, N.
    Pearce, P.
    Farrow, J.
    Thorpe, R. B.
    Kirkby, N. F.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (01) : 185 - 195
  • [20] Economic, energy and environmental life cycle assessment of a liquid flow window in different climates
    Lyu, Yuanli
    Chow, Tin-tai
    [J]. BUILDING SIMULATION, 2020, 13 (04) : 837 - 848