Automated screening versus manual screening:: A comparison of the ThinPrep® imaging system and manual screening in a time study

被引:29
|
作者
Schledermann, Doris [1 ]
Hyldebrandt, Tina [1 ]
Ejersbo, Dorthe [1 ]
Hoelund, Berit [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
关键词
cytology; cervix; liquid based cytology; automated screening; ThinPrep; Imager;
D O I
10.1002/dc.20640
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) is an automated system that assists cytotechnologists in the primary screening of ThinPrep liquid based cervical samples. Between June 1, 2004, and April 1, 2005, four experienced cytotechnologists participated in the study in which the duration of the screening procedure was timed for each of the 11,354 slides included. In every slide 22 fields of view were reviewed, and the samples that contained potentially abnormal cells were fully screened. The screening time was reduced by 42% (mean) (p < 0.001). By manual rescreening of the negative TIS samples, abnormal cells were found in 10 samples (false negative rate 0.14%). In every case the abnormal cells had been identified by the scanner, but misinterpreted by the cytotechnologist. These findings stressed the importance of carefulness in the interpretation of the marked fields and beyond that helped the cytotechnologists and pathologists to have more confidence in the automated system.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 352
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of ThinPrep pap test diagnoses following manual screening with subsequent screening using the ThinPrep Imaging System
    Shorie, Julie
    Underwood, Dawn
    Brainard, Jennifer
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 108 (05): : 399 - 400
  • [2] Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens
    Tanaka, Kyoko
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Tozawa-Ono, Akiko
    Suzuki, Nao
    Takamatsu, Kiyoshi
    Nakamura, Masaru
    Tsunoda, Hajime
    Seino, Shigeo
    Kobayashi, Noriko
    Shirayama, Takefumi
    Takahashi, Fumiaki
    [J]. ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2020, 64 (05) : 486 - 491
  • [3] A comparison of automated and manual screening: Theoretical considerations
    Sherman, ME
    [J]. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AND PREVENTION, 1997, : 306 - 310
  • [4] Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Manual Screening and the ThinPrep Imaging System in Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology
    Ozcan, Zuhal
    Kimiloglu, Elife
    Akyildiz Igdem, Aysenur
    Erdogan, Nusret
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2020, 36 (02) : 135 - 141
  • [5] The comparison of the diagnostic utility of manual screening and thinprep imaging system in liquid-based servical cytology
    Ozcan, Z.
    Kimiloglu, E.
    Igdem, A. Akyildiz
    Erdogan, N.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S308 - S308
  • [6] The false-negative rate of the ThinPrep Imaging System compares favorably with manual screening
    不详
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05): : 366 - 366
  • [7] Comparison of manual screening times for SurePath, ThinPrep and conventional Pap tests
    不详
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05): : 352 - 352
  • [8] Comparison of the ThinPrep® Imaging System Versus Total Manual Rescreening
    Martin, E. L.
    Michael, C. W.
    Shyu, S.
    Bomeisl, P.
    Wasman, J.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 477A - 478A
  • [9] Hologic Thinprep Imaging System for Routine Urine Screening: Evaluation of Screening Time and Diagnostic Comparison
    Ferraro, K.
    Kanaracus, A.
    Kurian, E. M.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 89A - 89A
  • [10] Comparison of the ThinPrep® Imaging System Versus Total Manual Rescreening
    Martin, E. L.
    Michael, C. W.
    Shyu, S.
    Bomeisl, P.
    Wasman, J.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 477A - 478A