Automated screening versus manual screening:: A comparison of the ThinPrep® imaging system and manual screening in a time study

被引:29
|
作者
Schledermann, Doris [1 ]
Hyldebrandt, Tina [1 ]
Ejersbo, Dorthe [1 ]
Hoelund, Berit [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
关键词
cytology; cervix; liquid based cytology; automated screening; ThinPrep; Imager;
D O I
10.1002/dc.20640
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) is an automated system that assists cytotechnologists in the primary screening of ThinPrep liquid based cervical samples. Between June 1, 2004, and April 1, 2005, four experienced cytotechnologists participated in the study in which the duration of the screening procedure was timed for each of the 11,354 slides included. In every slide 22 fields of view were reviewed, and the samples that contained potentially abnormal cells were fully screened. The screening time was reduced by 42% (mean) (p < 0.001). By manual rescreening of the negative TIS samples, abnormal cells were found in 10 samples (false negative rate 0.14%). In every case the abnormal cells had been identified by the scanner, but misinterpreted by the cytotechnologist. These findings stressed the importance of carefulness in the interpretation of the marked fields and beyond that helped the cytotechnologists and pathologists to have more confidence in the automated system.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 352
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In praise of manual high-throughput screening
    Kaganman, Irene
    Evanko, Daniel
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2006, 3 (09) : 662 - 663
  • [42] Development of an automated tool to score the Headache Screening Questionnaire: Agreement between automated and manual scoring
    van der Meer, Hedwig Aleida
    Brusaca, Luiz Augusto
    de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz
    Speksnijder, Caroline Margina
    Calixtre, Leticia Bojikian
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 57
  • [43] A new generation of antibody screening test using EM technology on a fully automated system and a manual workstation
    Herbert, F.
    Boulet, A.
    Buns, D.
    Delanoe, A.
    Desmet, P.
    Godefroy, V.
    Pelosin, J. M.
    Petit, S.
    Sergent, S.
    Boulet, O.
    Fauconnier, L.
    [J]. VOX SANGUINIS, 2006, 91 : 112 - 113
  • [44] Automated and Manual Non Mydriatic Digital Retinal Imaging in Community-based Tele-Ocular Screening
    John, Ann M.
    Kommana, Sumana S.
    Mendez, Nicole
    Blazier, Saysha
    Szirth, Bernard C.
    Khouri, Albert S.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [45] Comparison of Cytyc Imager versus manual review of cervical ThinPrep slides
    Pacheco, MC
    Bishop, JW
    Conley, RC
    Pennington, DW
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 : 68A - 69A
  • [46] Comparison of cytyc imager versus manual review of cervical ThinPrep slides
    Pacheco, MC
    Bishop, JW
    Conley, RC
    Pennington, DW
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2006, 86 : 68A - 69A
  • [47] RAPID SCREENING OF NO FURTHER REVIEW SLIDES GENERATED FROM BD FOCALPOINT™ GUIDED SCREENING IMAGING SYSTEM LESSONS LEARNED FROM MANUAL ASSESSMENT VS. AUTOMATED READING IN CYTOLOGYTRIAL
    Mather, J.
    Desai, M.
    Rana, D. N.
    Moss, S.
    Kitchener, H. C.
    [J]. ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2010, 54 (03) : 400 - 400
  • [48] Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging system: Clinical experience in a low risk screening population
    Papillo, Jacalyn L.
    St John, Timothy L.
    Leiman, Gladwyn
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (03) : 155 - 160
  • [49] Validation of the ThinPrep® Imaging System (TIS) for primary screening in routine clinical practice
    不详
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05): : 323 - 323
  • [50] Comparison of blood bank automated system versus current manual methods
    Ho, R
    Lim, S
    Chan, LC
    Lee, SH
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2003, 43 (09) : 106A - 107A