Individual and Institutional Accountability: The Case of Research Assessment

被引:12
|
作者
Lewis, Jenny M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
accountability; performance measurement; autonomy; research assessment systems; RESEARCH FUNDING SYSTEMS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PERFORMANCE; REFORM; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8500.12105
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Performance measurement is a particular type of accountability, which might be imposed by governments but is institutionally implemented and individually experienced. Over the last three decades, the emphasis on measuring the performance of publicly funded services has risen, along with concerns about the need to demonstrate a wise use of public funds. This paper examines the dynamic interaction of the institutional and individual levels of accountability, by focusing on research assessment systems. A study of three universities in different nations reveals that the perceived impacts of these systems relate to specific institutional contexts, but that individuals' views from within the same context also vary considerably. Professionals understand and interact with accountability systems in a manner that reflects their own values, and this ensures that they will interpret and react to them in different ways. This makes designing accountability systems without negative affects on individuals a difficult task.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 416
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the undergraduate French major: Institutional and individual accountability
    Hope, GR
    [J]. FRENCH REVIEW, 1999, 72 (03): : 456 - 468
  • [2] Institutional Design for Accountability: The Colombian Case
    Isaza Espinosa, Carolina
    [J]. GESTION Y POLITICA PUBLICA, 2015, 24 (02): : 339 - 375
  • [3] An empirical assessment of institutional and individual research productivity in international operations management
    Babbar, S
    Prasad, S
    Tata, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (11-12) : 1392 - 1410
  • [4] The Case for Individual Audit Partner Accountability
    Honigsberg, Colleen
    [J]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 2019, 72 (06) : 1871 - 1922
  • [5] ONLINE GROUP COLLABORATION WITH INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ASSESSMENT
    Kutaka-Kennedy, J.
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2013), 2013, : 2664 - 2664
  • [6] Sexual Misconduct: Policies to Improve Institutional Accountability and Reduce Individual Burdens
    Lamothe, Meeyoung
    LePere-Schloop, Megan
    Lim, Sungdae
    Yeo, Jungwon
    Beaton, Erynn Elizabeth
    Brower, Ralph
    Kim, Sung-Ju
    Lee, Misun
    Yoo, Eunsil
    [J]. NONPROFIT POLICY FORUM, 2022, 13 (04) : 361 - 370
  • [7] Individual, organizational, and institutional accountability: a systematic literature review in public administration
    Li, Yanwei
    Koppenjan, Joop
    Wang, Huanming
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [8] Institutional design and the accountability paradox: A case study of three Aboriginal accountability regimes in Canada
    Alcantara, Christopher
    Spicer, Zachary
    Leone, Roberto
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2012, 55 (01): : 69 - 90
  • [9] CASE FOR INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT
    DAVIDSON, FP
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1971, 74 (02): : 20 - &
  • [10] THE VALUE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
    ROGERS, BH
    GENTEMANN, KM
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1989, 30 (03) : 345 - 355