Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:275
|
作者
Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C. [1 ]
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E. [1 ]
Pappas-Gogos, George [1 ]
Farantos, Charalampos [1 ]
Benetatos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Mavridou, Paraskevi [2 ]
Manataki, Adamantia [2 ]
机构
[1] G Hatzikosta Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece
[2] G Hatzikosta Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Scarless cholecystectomy; New techniques in laparoscopy; Single-port access; Abdominal pain; Shoulder pain; INTRAPERITONEAL NORMAL SALINE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ROPIVACAINE; INFUSION; INFILTRATION; BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS). Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups. SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / 1848
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Yau, Kevin Kwok-Kay
    Li, Michael Ka-Wah
    SURGICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 15 (02) : 64 - 65
  • [42] The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study
    Deveci, Ugur
    Barbaros, Umut
    Kapakli, Mahmut Sertan
    Manukyan, Manuk Norayk
    Simsek, Selcuk
    Kebudi, Abut
    Mercan, Selcuk
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 85 (06): : 275 - 282
  • [43] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-a matched pair analysis
    Gangl, Odo
    Hofer, Wolfgang
    Tomaselli, Florian
    Sautner, Thomas
    Fuegger, Reinhold
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (06) : 819 - 824
  • [44] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)—a matched pair analysis
    Odo Gangl
    Wolfgang Hofer
    Florian Tomaselli
    Thomas Sautner
    Reinhold Függer
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2011, 396
  • [45] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Wu, Shuo Dong
    Han, Jin Yan
    Tian, Yu
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (01): : 25 - 28
  • [46] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy- A rural center experience
    Ravindran, Sharanya
    Venkat, Shruthi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [47] Laparoscopic-guided versus transincisional rectus sheath block for pediatric single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Kauffman, Jeremy D.
    Nguyen, Anh Thy H.
    Litz, Cristen N.
    Farach, Sandra M.
    DeRosa, JoAnn C.
    Gonzalez, Raquel
    Amankwah, Ernest K.
    Danielson, Paul D.
    Chandler, Nicole M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2020, 55 (08) : 1436 - 1443
  • [48] Cost Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    McMahon, Meredith C.
    Martin, Robert C.
    Kehdy, Farid
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S1012 - S1012
  • [49] Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial
    Ostlie, Daniel J.
    Juang, Obinna O. Adibe David
    Iqbal, Corey W.
    Sharp, Susan W.
    Snyder, Charles L.
    Andrews, Walter S.
    Sharp, Ronald J.
    Holcomb, George W., III
    St Peter, Shawn D.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2013, 48 (01) : 209 - 214
  • [50] Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) versus Conventional Three-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Single Center Experience
    Anis, Saad Bin
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Rehman, Pir Muneeb
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 12 (04): : 1522 - 1524