Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:275
|
作者
Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C. [1 ]
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E. [1 ]
Pappas-Gogos, George [1 ]
Farantos, Charalampos [1 ]
Benetatos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Mavridou, Paraskevi [2 ]
Manataki, Adamantia [2 ]
机构
[1] G Hatzikosta Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece
[2] G Hatzikosta Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Scarless cholecystectomy; New techniques in laparoscopy; Single-port access; Abdominal pain; Shoulder pain; INTRAPERITONEAL NORMAL SALINE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ROPIVACAINE; INFUSION; INFILTRATION; BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS). Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups. SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / 1848
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy
    Khambaty, Fatima
    Brody, Fred
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Edwards, Claire
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (05) : 967 - 972
  • [32] Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy
    Fatima Khambaty
    Fred Brody
    Khashayar Vaziri
    Claire Edwards
    World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35 : 967 - 972
  • [33] Single-access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Classic Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zehetner, Joerg
    Pelipad, Diana
    Darehzereshki, Ali
    Mason, Rodney J.
    Lipham, John C.
    Katkhouda, Namir
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 235 - 243
  • [34] Randomized clinical trial of single-versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Jorgensen, L. N.
    Rosenberg, J.
    Al-Tayar, H.
    Assaadzadeh, S.
    Helgstrand, F.
    Bisgaard, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (04) : 347 - 355
  • [35] Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Cotirlet, A.
    Nedelcu, M.
    Popa, E.
    Anghel, R.
    Rau, S.
    Motoc, I.
    Tincu, E.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 769 - 773
  • [36] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Multi-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Wu, Xiang-Song
    Shi, Liu-Bin
    Gu, Jun
    Dong, Ping
    Lu, Jian-Hua
    Li, Mao-Lan
    Mu, Jia-Sheng
    Wu, Wen-Guang
    Yang, Jia-Hua
    Ding, Qi-Chen
    Zhang, Lin
    Liu, Ying-Bin
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 183 - 191
  • [37] Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    de Carvalho, Luis Filipe Abreu
    Fierens, Kjell
    Kint, Marc
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (02): : 109 - 116
  • [38] Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study
    Sinha, Rajeev
    Yadav, Albel S.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2014, 10 (04) : 175 - 179
  • [39] Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Albrink, Michael
    Morton, Connor
    Villadolid, Desiree
    Ross, Sharona B.
    Cowgill, Sarah
    Tapper, Donovan
    Rosemurgy, Alexander S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A862 - A862
  • [40] Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Lai, Eric C. H.
    Yang, George P. C.
    Tang, Chung Ngai
    Yih, Patricia C. L.
    Chan, Oliver C. Y.
    Li, Michael K. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 202 (03): : 254 - 258