Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumours: Quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI

被引:33
|
作者
Mussurakis, S [1 ]
Gibbs, P [1 ]
Horsman, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull Royal Infirm, Ctr MR Invest, Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
关键词
breasts; neoplasms; diseases; magnetic resonance imaging; physics and instrumentation;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199801000-00007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to determine if quantitative analysis of peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity is useful in the characterisation of abnormalities seen at breast MRI. Method: Ninety-one women underwent dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI. Regions of interest were processed by a parallel thinning algorithm to define central and peripheral subregions of lesions. Peripheral enhancement was quantified at every time point of the dynamic sequence as a signal difference-to-noise ratio. Moreover, a radiologist assessed the images for the presence of peripheral enhancement and classified the regional and subregional time-intensity profiles of each lesion. Results: Sixty-four invasive carcinomas and 30 benign lesions were analysed. Significant differences were found between benign and malignant lesions in peripheral enhancement as determined from the dynamic images (p = 0.0002; sensitivity, 0.34; specificity, 1.00) in time-intensity profiles (p < 0.000005; sensitivity, 0.67; specificity, 0.93) and in peripheral percentage signal chances at 1 min postcontrast (p = 0.001). There was a much higher relative signal increase centrally than peripherally (p < 0.0005), but peripheral signal changes had greater diagnostic value than central ones (A(z) = 0.72 vs. 0.63; p = 0.02). Carcinomas showed higher peripheral enhancement than benign lesions (p = 0.001). Peripheral enhancement reached maximum diagnostic value at 4 min postcontrast (A(z) = 0.80) and performed best as a highly sensitive but moderately specific diagnostic index. Conclusion: Quantification of peripheral enhancement is diagnostically useful and offers insight into the enhancement mechanisms encountered in breast MRI. Primary breast tumours show substantial spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity. Lesion differentiation based on percentage signal changes is improved by restricting sampling to the periphery of tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Field strength dependence of MRI contrast enhancement: Phantom measurements and application to dynamic breast imaging
    Hittmair, K
    Turetschek, K
    Gomiscek, G
    Stiglbauer, R
    Schurawitzki, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (819): : 215 - 220
  • [42] Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis
    Liu, PF
    Debatin, JF
    Caduff, RF
    Kacl, G
    Garzoli, E
    Krestin, GP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (845): : 501 - 509
  • [43] Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Background Parenchymal Enhancement Heterogeneity on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Radiomics Study
    Wang, Jeff
    Kato, Fumi
    Oyama-Manabe, Noriko
    Li, Ruijiang
    Cui, Yi
    Tha, Khin Khin
    Yamashita, Hiroko
    Kudo, Kohsuke
    Shirato, Hiroki
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [44] Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Radjenovic, A.
    Dall, B. J.
    Ridgway, J. P.
    Smith, M. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (962): : 120 - 128
  • [45] The correlation between FDG PET and the vascular characteristic of breast tumours measured using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI
    Semple, SIK
    Staff, RT
    Gilbert, FJ
    Redpath, TW
    Ahearn, TS
    Welch, AE
    Heys, SD
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 : S231 - S231
  • [46] Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast enhancement combined with conventional MRI in differentiating benign and malignant lacrimal gland epithelial tumours
    Jian, T.
    Yang, M.
    Wu, T.
    Ji, X.
    Xia, S.
    Sun, F.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (03) : e345 - e352
  • [47] Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinoma
    Van Cann, Ellen M.
    Rijpkema, Mark
    Heerschap, Arend
    van der Bilt, Andries
    Koole, Ron
    Stoelinga, Paul J. W.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 44 (12) : 1147 - 1154
  • [48] Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Assessment of Bowel Inflammation in Crohn's Disease
    Oto, A.
    Fan, X.
    Mustafi, D.
    Kulkarni, K.
    Zhu, F.
    Karczmar, G.
    Turner, J.
    Rubin, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (05)
  • [49] Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Cell Proliferation in Brain Gliomas with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Jiang, Jia Shen
    Hua, Ye
    Zhou, Xue Jun
    Shen, Dan Dan
    Shi, Jin Long
    Ge, Min
    Geng, Qi Nan
    Jia, Zhong Zheng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (09) : 1215 - 1221
  • [50] The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Saracco, Ariel
    Strand, Fredrik
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Sundbom, Ann
    Hall, Per
    Dickman, Paul W.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (12) : 1600 - 1607