Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumours: Quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI

被引:33
|
作者
Mussurakis, S [1 ]
Gibbs, P [1 ]
Horsman, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull Royal Infirm, Ctr MR Invest, Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
关键词
breasts; neoplasms; diseases; magnetic resonance imaging; physics and instrumentation;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199801000-00007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to determine if quantitative analysis of peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity is useful in the characterisation of abnormalities seen at breast MRI. Method: Ninety-one women underwent dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI. Regions of interest were processed by a parallel thinning algorithm to define central and peripheral subregions of lesions. Peripheral enhancement was quantified at every time point of the dynamic sequence as a signal difference-to-noise ratio. Moreover, a radiologist assessed the images for the presence of peripheral enhancement and classified the regional and subregional time-intensity profiles of each lesion. Results: Sixty-four invasive carcinomas and 30 benign lesions were analysed. Significant differences were found between benign and malignant lesions in peripheral enhancement as determined from the dynamic images (p = 0.0002; sensitivity, 0.34; specificity, 1.00) in time-intensity profiles (p < 0.000005; sensitivity, 0.67; specificity, 0.93) and in peripheral percentage signal chances at 1 min postcontrast (p = 0.001). There was a much higher relative signal increase centrally than peripherally (p < 0.0005), but peripheral signal changes had greater diagnostic value than central ones (A(z) = 0.72 vs. 0.63; p = 0.02). Carcinomas showed higher peripheral enhancement than benign lesions (p = 0.001). Peripheral enhancement reached maximum diagnostic value at 4 min postcontrast (A(z) = 0.80) and performed best as a highly sensitive but moderately specific diagnostic index. Conclusion: Quantification of peripheral enhancement is diagnostically useful and offers insight into the enhancement mechanisms encountered in breast MRI. Primary breast tumours show substantial spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity. Lesion differentiation based on percentage signal changes is improved by restricting sampling to the periphery of tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Hittmair, K.
    Gomiscek, G.
    Langenberger, K.
    Recht, M.
    Imhof, H.
    Kramer, J.
    1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (31):
  • [2] Quantifying heterogeneity of lesion uptake in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis
    Karahaliou, A.
    Vassiou, K.
    Skiadopoulos, S.
    Kanavou, T.
    Yiakoumelos, A.
    Costaridou, L.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2009, 4
  • [3] Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis
    Karahaliou, A.
    Vassiou, K.
    Arikidis, N. S.
    Skiadopoulos, S.
    Kanavou, T.
    Costaridou, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (988): : 296 - 306
  • [4] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Quantitative Method for Kinetic Curve Type Assessment
    El Khouli, Riham H.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Khalil, Tarek H.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Dwyer, Andrew
    Bluemke, David A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) : W295 - W300
  • [5] Heterogeneity of enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and implication of distant metastasis in invasive breast cancer
    Zhao, R.
    Ma, W. J.
    Tang, J.
    Chen, Y. Z.
    Zhang, L. N.
    Lu, H.
    Liu, P. F.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (12) : 961.e25 - 961.e32
  • [6] Quantitative evaluation of contrast agent uptake in standard fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examinations of the breast
    Kousi, Evanthia
    Smith, Joely
    Ledger, Araminta E.
    Scurr, Erica
    Allen, Steven
    Wilson, Robin M.
    O'Flynn, Elizabeth
    Pope, Romney J. E.
    Leach, Martin O.
    Schmidt, Maria A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (01) : 287 - 296
  • [7] Quantifying Spatial Heterogeneity in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameter Maps
    Rose, Chris J.
    Mills, Samantha J.
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Buonaccorsi, Giovanni A.
    Roberts, Caleb
    Watson, Yvonne
    Cheung, Susan
    Zhao, Sha
    Whitcher, Brandon
    Jackson, Alan
    Parker, Geoffrey J. M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) : 488 - 499
  • [8] Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer
    Su, MY
    Cheung, YC
    Fruehauf, JP
    Yu, H
    Nalcioglu, O
    Mechetner, E
    Kyshtoobayeva, A
    Chen, SC
    Hsueh, S
    McLaren, CE
    Wan, YL
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 18 (04) : 467 - 477
  • [9] Dynamic contrast ultrasound examination of malignant breast tumours: Comparison against dynamic breast MRI and histological features
    Teh, WW
    Shah, BK
    Shah, KA
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 606 - 606
  • [10] The breast dynamic contrast enhanced, MRI: Preliminary results of a quantitative analysis
    Di Nallo, A. M.
    Crecco, M.
    Ortenzia, O.
    Ordonez, R.
    Abate, A.
    Benassi, M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 26 (02) : 235 - 239