Potential of anaerobic digestion for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and production of renewable energy from agriculture: barriers and incentives to widespread adoption in Europe

被引:24
|
作者
Banks, C. J. [1 ]
Salter, A. M.
Chesshire, M.
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Civil Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Greenfinch Ltd, Ludlow SY8 1XE, England
关键词
agricultural wastes; anaerobic digestion; European policy; greenhouse gas emissions; renewable energy;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2007.319
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper considers the role of anaerobic digestion in promoting good agricultural practice on farms and the contribution this would make to reducing the environmental impacts associated with manure management. There are no regulatory drivers to promote the use of digestion in Europe, and the technology has only been widely adopted where economic drivers and coherent policies have been implemented at a national level. These measures have included direct subsidy on the energy price paid for "green electricity", and exemption of tax when biogas is used as a vehicle fuel. In those countries where financial incentives are not available or where a financial penalty is incurred through the regulatory regime, the uptake of digestion has been poor. Even with subsidies, digestion of animal manures as a single substrate is not common, and countries with successful schemes have achieved this either by permitting the import of wastes onto the farm or offering bonus subsidies for the use of energy crops. Both of these measures improve the energy efficiency of the process by increasing the volumetric methane production, although concerns are expressed that attention could concentrate on energy production at the expense of improving manure management.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 173
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Meta-Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Anaerobic Digestion Processes in Dairy Farms
    Miranda, Nicole D.
    Tuomisto, Hanna L.
    McCulloch, Malcolm D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (08) : 5211 - 5219
  • [42] Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations
    Amponsah, Nana Yaw
    Troldborg, Mads
    Kington, Bethany
    Aalders, Inge
    Hough, Rupert Lloyd
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 : 461 - 475
  • [43] Mitigation policies for energy related greenhouse gas emissions in Cyprus: the potential role of natural gas imports
    Mirasgedis, S
    Sarafidis, Y
    Georgopoulou, E
    Lalas, DP
    Papastavros, C
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (08) : 1001 - 1011
  • [44] Modelled impacts of mitigation measures on greenhouse gas emissions from Finnish agriculture up to 2020
    Regina, Kristiina
    Lehtonen, Heikki
    Nousiainen, Jouni
    Esala, Martti
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (3-4) : 477 - 493
  • [45] Adoption of precision livestock farming technologies has the potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from beef production
    Mcnicol, Louise C.
    Bowen, Jenna M.
    Ferguson, Holly J.
    Bell, Julian
    Dewhurst, Richard J.
    Duthie, Carol-Anne
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [46] Renewable energy development in China: Resource assessment, technology status, and greenhouse gas mitigation potential
    Li, JF
    Wan, YH
    Ohi, JM
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 1997, 56 (3-4) : 381 - 394
  • [47] Assessment of energy biomass potential and greenhouse gas emissions from biogas production from perennial grasses
    Nekrosius, Arvydas
    Navickas, Kestutis
    Venslauskas, Kestutis
    Kadziuliene, Zydre
    Tilvikiene, Vita
    [J]. ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2014, 101 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [48] Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and mitigation options from livestock production in peri-urban agriculture: Beijing - A case study
    Wei, S.
    Bai, Z. H.
    Chadwick, D.
    Hou, Y.
    Qin, W.
    Zhao, Z. Q.
    Jiang, R. F.
    Ma, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 : 515 - 525
  • [49] Greenhouse gas emissions in US beef production can be reduced by up to 30% with the adoption of selected mitigation measures
    Pelton, Rylie E. O.
    Kazanski, Clare E.
    Keerthi, Shamitha
    Racette, Kelly A.
    Gennet, Sasha
    Springer, Nathaniel
    Yacobson, Eugene
    Wironen, Michael
    Ray, Deepak
    Johnson, Kris
    Schmitt, Jennifer
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2024, 5 (09):
  • [50] Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effectiveness of potential US modal freight policies
    Nealer, Rachael
    Matthews, H. Scott
    Hendrickson, Chris
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (03) : 588 - 601