Adoption of precision livestock farming technologies has the potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from beef production

被引:1
|
作者
Mcnicol, Louise C. [1 ]
Bowen, Jenna M. [1 ]
Ferguson, Holly J. [1 ]
Bell, Julian [2 ]
Dewhurst, Richard J. [1 ]
Duthie, Carol-Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] SRUC, Peter Wilson Bldg, Kings Bldg, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Agrecalc Ltd, Peter Wilson Bldg, Kings Bldg, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
accelerometers; carbon footprint; fertility; health; modelling; production efficiency; sensors; sustainable agriculture; ESTRUS DETECTION; APPLICABILITY; METHANE; IMPACT; TOOLS; LAMB;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2024.1414858
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
To meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit the increase in global temperature to 1.5 degrees C, significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions will be needed across all sectors. This includes agriculture which accounts for a significant proportion of global GHG emissions. There is therefore a pressing need for the uptake of new technologies on farms to reduce GHG emissions and move towards current policy targets. Recently, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies have been highlighted as a promising GHG mitigation strategy to indirectly reduce GHG emissions through increasing production efficiencies. Using Scotland as a case study, average data from the Scottish Cattle Tracing System (CTS) was used to create two baseline beef production scenarios (one grazing and one housed system) and emission estimates were calculated using the Agrecalc carbon footprinting tool. The effects of adopting various PLF technologies on whole farm and product emissions were then modelled. Scenarios included adoption of automatic weigh platforms, accelerometer-based sensors for oestrus detection (fertility sensors) and accelerometer-based sensors for early disease detection (health sensors). Model assumptions were based on validated technologies, direct experience from farms and expert opinion. Adoption of all three PLF technologies reduced total emissions (kg CO2e) and product emissions (kg CO2e/kg deadweight) in both the grazing and housed systems. In general, adoption of PLF technologies had a larger impact in the housed system than in the grazing system. For example, while health sensors reduced total emissions by 6.1% in the housed system, their impact was slightly lower in the grazing system at 4.4%. The largest reduction in total emissions was seen following the adoption of an automatic weight platform which reduced the age at slaughter by 3 months in the grazing system (6.8%) and sensors for health monitoring in the housed system (6.1%). Health sensors also resulted in the largest reduction in product emissions for both the housed (12.0%) and grazing systems (10.5%). These findings suggest PLF could be an effective GHG mitigation strategy for beef systems in Scotland. Although this study utilised data from beef farms in Scotland, comparable emission reductions are likely attainable in other European countries with similar farming systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    Cullen, Brendan R.
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    McSweeney, Chris
    Cohn, Philip
    Eckard, Richard J.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 370 - 384
  • [2] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production
    Weiske, A
    Petersen, SO
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) : 105 - 106
  • [3] Beef production and greenhouse gas emissions
    Avery, Alex
    Avery, Deirmis
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 116 (09) : A374 - A375
  • [4] The impacts of precision livestock farming tools on the greenhouse gas emissions of an average Scottish dairy farm
    Ferguson, H. J.
    Bowen, J. M.
    McNicol, L. C.
    Bell, J.
    Duthie, C-A.
    Dewhurst, R. J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions and biogas potential from livestock in Ecuador
    Cornejo, Camilo
    Wilkie, Ann C.
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 14 (04) : 256 - 266
  • [6] Greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production systems
    Henry, Beverley
    Eckard, Richard
    [J]. TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 2009, 43 : 232 - 238
  • [7] What is the potential for reducing national greenhouse gas emissions from crop and livestock production systems?
    Audsley, Eric
    Wilkinson, Mike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 73 : 263 - 268
  • [8] Greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production in Brazil: how we can mitigate from animal operations?
    Aurea, Andre Pastori D.
    da Silva Cardoso, Abmael S.
    Fernandes, Lauriston Bertelli
    Reis, Ricardo Andrade
    Ferreira, Luis Eduardo
    Rosa Guimaraes, Yuri Santa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 430 - 430
  • [9] Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States
    Hope W. Phetteplace
    Donald E. Johnson
    Andrew F. Seidl
    [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 99 - 102
  • [10] Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe
    Bellarby, Jessica
    Tirado, Reyes
    Leip, Adrian
    Weiss, Franz
    Lesschen, Jan Peter
    Smith, Pete
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (01) : 3 - 18