共 50 条
Comparison of three two-dimensional echocardiographic methods of assessing left ventricular size in Doberman Pinschers*
被引:2
|作者:
Kruckman, L.
[1
]
Fries, R. C.
[1
]
Kadotani, S.
[1
]
Stack, J. P.
[1
]
Wallace, L. G.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Vet Clin Med, 1008 W Hazelwood Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词:
Cardiovascular;
Ultrasound;
Canine;
Anatomic M-mode;
M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY;
EFFICACY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jvc.2021.05.011
中图分类号:
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号:
0906 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Compare three methods of obtaining linear left ventricular dimensions within the same Doberman Pinscher (DP). Animals: One hundred and thirty-nine client-owned DP. Materials and Methods: Linear left ventricular dimensions were measured using two-dimensional short-axis (Sx-2D), motion-mode short-axis (Sx-MM), and motionmode long-axis (Lx-MM) methods, then left ventricular volumes were obtained using monoplane Simpson's method of discs (SMOD). A Friedman test with Dunn's multiple comparisons was used to compare differences between methods. Bias and correlation were evaluated via Bland-Altman and Spearman's correlation. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing occult dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) compared to SMOD were determined. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated for intra- and inter-observer measurement variability. Results: There were significant differences between all linear dimensions in diastole and systole. Short-axis 2D measurements had significant bias compared with Sx-MM (diastole +1.19 mm, systole +1.65 mm) and Lx-MM (diastole +4.36 mm, systole +3.87 mm) as did Sx-MM compared with Lx-MM (diastole +3.17 mm, systole +2.22 mm). All linear dimensions had a moderate positive correlation with SMOD. The sensitivity and specificity of linear measurements to detect DCM were: Sx-2D (sensitivity 72.0%, specificity 88.5%), Sx-MM (sensitivity 52.0%, specificity 92.0%), and Lx-MM (sensitivity 37.5%, specificity 99.1%). All methods had acceptably low CV for intra-and inter-observer measurement variability. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that linear measurements are repeatable and correlate with reference standard; however, there is a significant bias between measurements, and they should not be used interchangeably. 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文