Characterization of forces applied by endoscopists during colonoscopy by using a wireless colonoscopy force monitor

被引:22
|
作者
Korman, Louis Y. [1 ]
Egorov, Vladimir [2 ]
Tsuryupa, Sergey [2 ]
Corbin, Brendan [2 ]
Anderson, Mary [1 ]
Sarvazyan, Noune [2 ]
Sarvazyan, Armen [2 ]
机构
[1] Chevy Chase Clin Res, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 USA
[2] Artann Labs, Trenton, NJ USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; CECAL INTUBATION; UNITED-STATES; TASK-FORCE; POPULATION; SURVEILLANCE; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.029
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To perform a colonoscopy, the endoscopist maneuvers the colonoscope through a series of loops by applying force to the insertion tube. Colonoscopy insertion techniques ire operator dependent but have never been comprehensively quantified. Objective: To determine whether the Colonoscopy Force Monitor (CFM), a device that continually measures force applied to the insertion tube, can identify different force application patterns among experienced endoscopists. Design: Observational study of 6 experienced endoscopists performing routine diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in 30 patients. Setting: Outpatient ambulatory endoscopy center. Patients: Adult male and female patients between 30 and 75 years of age undergoing routine colonoscopy. Interventions: CFM monitoring of force applied to the colonoscope insertion tube during colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements: Maximum and mean linear and torque force, time derivative of force, combined linear and torque vector force, and total manipulation time. Results: The CFM demonstrates differences among endoscopists for maximum and average push/pull and mean torque forces, time derivatives of force, combined push/torque force vector, and total manipulation time. Endoscopists could be grouped by force application patterns. Limitations: Only experienced endoscopists using conscious sedation in the patients were studied. Sample size was 30 patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CFM allows continuous force monitoring, characterization, and display of similarities and differences in endoscopic technique. CFM has the potential to facilitate training by enabling trainees to assess, compare, and quantify their techniques and progress. (Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:327-34.)
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How much force is required to perforate a colon during colonoscopy? An experimental study
    Johnson, Steve
    Schultz, Michael
    Scholze, Mario
    Smith, Troy
    Woodfield, John
    Hammer, Niels
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2019, 91 : 139 - 148
  • [42] Endoscopists With Low Sedation RATES Detect More Colorectal Adenomas in Colonoscopy Than Colleagues Frequently Using Sedation
    Jeschek, Philip
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Gessl, Irina
    Sallinger, Daniela
    Zagata, Jakob
    Ferlitsch, Monika
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB282 - AB282
  • [43] OCCULT INJURIES DURING COLONOSCOPY - MEASUREMENT OF FORCES REQUIRED TO INJURE COLON AND REPORT OF CASES
    WU, TK
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1978, 24 (05) : 236 - 238
  • [44] Use of artificial intelligence in improving adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: Might both endoscopists and pathologists be further helped
    Emanuele Sinagra
    Matteo Badalamenti
    Marcello Maida
    Marco Spadaccini
    Roberta Maselli
    Francesca Rossi
    Giuseppe Conoscenti
    Dario Raimondo
    Socrate Pallio
    Alessandro Repici
    Andrea Anderloni
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2020, (39) : 5911 - 5918
  • [45] Use of a Real-Time Magnetic Endoscopic Imaging (MEI) System to Evaluate Endoscopists' Spatial Awareness During Colonoscopy
    Rotman, Stephen
    Chan, Walter W.
    Ryou, Marvin
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB268 - AB268
  • [46] IS THERE A BENEFIT FOR COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION OF POLYPS DURING SCREENING COLONOSCOPY AMONG EXPERIENCED ENDOSCOPISTS IN A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SETTING?
    Ahsan, Mohammed
    Anderson, Zackary
    Bakr, Maged
    Phillips, Raymond W.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S977 - S977
  • [47] Colorectal Polyp Detection Rates During Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Comparison of 19" CRT Monitor Versus 42" Plasma Monitor
    Godil, Aslam
    Chang, Andrew
    Foliente, Roy
    Hill, Kevin
    Wadatz, Dale
    Chang, Alexander
    Godil, Ayesha
    Chang, Lauren
    Foliente, Ralph
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S561 - S562
  • [48] Use of artificial intelligence in improving adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: Might both endoscopists and pathologists be further helped
    Sinagra, Emanuele
    Badalamenti, Matteo
    Maida, Marcello
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Maselli, Roberta
    Rossi, Francesca
    Conoscenti, Giuseppe
    Raimondo, Dario
    Pallio, Socrate
    Repici, Alessandro
    Anderloni, Andrea
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (39) : 5911 - 5918
  • [49] 'Time to change': Utilization of monitor mounted timers to improve withdrawl time during the performance of colonoscopy
    Weiser, Kirsten
    Toor, Arifa
    Anderson, Peter
    Flynn, Maren
    Butterly, Lynn
    Robertson, Douglas
    Homa, Karen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 : S194 - S195
  • [50] Retrieval of dislodged AmplifEYE using balloon dilator during colonoscopy
    Li, Jihui
    Blake, Luke
    Wexner, Steven D.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2019, 7 (02): : 139 - 140