The effect of intergroup competition on intragroup affiliation in primates
被引:30
|
作者:
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Majolo, B.
[1
]
Vizioli, A. de Bortoli
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Cogniz, Rome, Italy
Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Sviluppo & Socializzaz, Padua, ItalyLincoln Univ, Sch Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
Vizioli, A. de Bortoli
[2
,3
]
Lehmann, J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Roehampton, Ctr Res Evolutionary Anthropol, London, EnglandLincoln Univ, Sch Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
Lehmann, J.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Lincoln Univ, Sch Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
[2] CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Cogniz, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Sviluppo & Socializzaz, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Roehampton, Ctr Res Evolutionary Anthropol, London, England
Researchers from various disciplines have hypothesized a positive correlation between the level of intergroup contest competition (IGCC) and the evolution of behavioural traits, such as cooperation, altruism and friendship, which promote intragroup affiliation. Empirical support for this hypothesis is, however, scarce and mainly available from humans. We tested whether the level of IGCC affects intragroup affiliation (i.e. intragroup grooming exchange) among male and female nonhuman primates. To quantify intragroup affiliation, we used social network measures and a grooming index. Our measure of IGCC combined frequency of intergroup encounters and proportion of aggressive encounters and was calculated separately for males and females. We ran our analyses on 27 wild groups of primates belonging to 15 species (13 Cercopithecinae, one Colobinae and one Cebinae). Our analyses reveal a clear pattern of correlated evolution between grooming network density and interindividual variation in the number of grooming partners on the one hand and the intensity of IGCC on the other in females, but not males. Thus, our results suggest that the exact nature of the relationship between IGCC and intragroup affiliation is sex specific. These results may be explained by the differential costs and benefits males and females experience during aggressive intergroup confrontations and by sex-specific differences in intragroup affiliation. (C) 2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.