A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation

被引:87
|
作者
Meuwly, Didier [1 ,2 ]
Ramos, Daniel [3 ]
Haraksim, Rudolf [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Forens Inst, Laan van Ypenburg 6, NL-2497GB The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522NB Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Escuela Politecn Super, ATVS Biometr Recognit Grp, C Francisco Tomas & Valiente 11, Madrid 28049, Spain
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Fac Elect Engn, LTS5 Signal Proc Lab, Stn 11, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Method validation; Automatic interpretation method; Strength of evidence; Accreditation; Validation report; STATISTICAL EVALUATION; DNA PROFILES; WEIGHT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
This Guideline proposes a protocol for the validation of forensic evaluation methods at the source level, using the Likelihood Ratio framework as defined within the Bayes' inference model. In the context of the inference of identity of source, the Likelihood Ratio is used to evaluate the strength of the evidence for a trace specimen, e.g. a fingermark, and a reference specimen, e.g. a fingerprint, to originate from common or different sources. Some theoretical aspects of probabilities necessary for this Guideline were discussed prior to its elaboration, which started after a workshop of forensic researchers and practitioners involved in this topic. In the workshop, the following questions were addressed: "which aspects of a forensic evaluation scenario need to be validated?'', "what is the role of the LR as part of a decision process?'' and "how to deal with uncertainty in the LR calculation?''. The questions: "what to validate?'' focuses on the validation methods and criteria and "how to validate?'' deals with the implementation of the validation protocol. Answers to these questions were deemed necessary with several objectives. First, concepts typical for validation standards [1], such as performance characteristics, performance metrics and validation criteria, will be adapted or applied by analogy to the LR framework. Second, a validation strategy will be defined. Third, validation methods will be described. Finally, a validation protocol and an example of validation report will be proposed, which can be applied to the forensic fields developing and validating LR methods for the evaluation of the strength of evidence at source level under the following propositions: H-1/Hss: The trace and reference originate from the same source. H-2/Hds: The trace and reference originate from different sources. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence
    Buckleton, J. S.
    Triggs, C. M.
    Champod, C.
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2006, 46 (02) : 69 - 78
  • [42] THE POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO AS A MEASURE OF EVIDENCE
    Smith, I.
    Ferrari, A.
    BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 1305 : 391 - 398
  • [43] EANM guideline on the validation of analytical methods for radiopharmaceuticals
    Gillings, Nic
    Todde, Sergio
    Behe, Martin
    Decristoforo, Clemens
    Elsinga, Philip
    Ferrari, Valentina
    Hjelstuen, Olaug
    Peitl, Petra Kolenc
    Koziorowski, Jacek
    Laverman, Peter
    Mindt, Thomas L.
    Ocak, Meltem
    Patt, Marianne
    EJNMMI RADIOPHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 5 (01)
  • [44] The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 11 (5498):
  • [45] EANM guideline on the validation of analytical methods for radiopharmaceuticals
    Nic Gillings
    Sergio Todde
    Martin Behe
    Clemens Decristoforo
    Philip Elsinga
    Valentina Ferrari
    Olaug Hjelstuen
    Petra Kolenc Peitl
    Jacek Koziorowski
    Peter Laverman
    Thomas L. Mindt
    Meltem Ocak
    Marianne Patt
    EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry, 5
  • [47] Evaluating Likelihood Ratio (LR) for firearm evidence identifications in forensic science based on the Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) method
    Song, John
    Chen, Zhe
    Vorburger, Theodore V.
    Soons, Johannes A.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 317
  • [48] Posterior likelihood ratios for evaluation of forensic trace evidence given a two-level model on the data
    Alberink, Ivo
    Bolck, Annabel
    Menges, Sonja
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 40 (12) : 2579 - 2600
  • [49] Data for validation of osteometric methods in forensic anthropology
    Langley, Natalie R.
    Jantz, Lee Meadows
    McNulty, Shauna
    Maijanen, Heli
    Ousley, Stephen D.
    Jantz, Richard L.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 19 : 21 - 28
  • [50] Likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence
    Blume, JD
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (17) : 2563 - 2599