A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation

被引:87
|
作者
Meuwly, Didier [1 ,2 ]
Ramos, Daniel [3 ]
Haraksim, Rudolf [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Forens Inst, Laan van Ypenburg 6, NL-2497GB The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522NB Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Escuela Politecn Super, ATVS Biometr Recognit Grp, C Francisco Tomas & Valiente 11, Madrid 28049, Spain
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Fac Elect Engn, LTS5 Signal Proc Lab, Stn 11, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Method validation; Automatic interpretation method; Strength of evidence; Accreditation; Validation report; STATISTICAL EVALUATION; DNA PROFILES; WEIGHT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
This Guideline proposes a protocol for the validation of forensic evaluation methods at the source level, using the Likelihood Ratio framework as defined within the Bayes' inference model. In the context of the inference of identity of source, the Likelihood Ratio is used to evaluate the strength of the evidence for a trace specimen, e.g. a fingermark, and a reference specimen, e.g. a fingerprint, to originate from common or different sources. Some theoretical aspects of probabilities necessary for this Guideline were discussed prior to its elaboration, which started after a workshop of forensic researchers and practitioners involved in this topic. In the workshop, the following questions were addressed: "which aspects of a forensic evaluation scenario need to be validated?'', "what is the role of the LR as part of a decision process?'' and "how to deal with uncertainty in the LR calculation?''. The questions: "what to validate?'' focuses on the validation methods and criteria and "how to validate?'' deals with the implementation of the validation protocol. Answers to these questions were deemed necessary with several objectives. First, concepts typical for validation standards [1], such as performance characteristics, performance metrics and validation criteria, will be adapted or applied by analogy to the LR framework. Second, a validation strategy will be defined. Third, validation methods will be described. Finally, a validation protocol and an example of validation report will be proposed, which can be applied to the forensic fields developing and validating LR methods for the evaluation of the strength of evidence at source level under the following propositions: H-1/Hss: The trace and reference originate from the same source. H-2/Hds: The trace and reference originate from different sources. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    Enzinger, Ewald
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2016, 56 (05) : 374 - 379
  • [22] Performance Evaluation of Source Camera Attribution by Using Likelihood Ratio Methods
    Ferrara, Pasquale
    Haraksim, Rudolf
    Beslay, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2021, 7 (07)
  • [23] An analysis and evaluation of methods currently used to quantify the likelihood of existential hazards
    Beard, Simon
    Rowe, Thomas
    Fox, James
    FUTURES, 2020, 115
  • [24] EVALUATION OF THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO FOR FIBER TRANSFER EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL-CASES
    EVETT, IW
    CAGE, PE
    AITKEN, CGG
    APPLIED STATISTICS-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C, 1987, 36 (02): : 174 - 180
  • [25] Evaluation of Methods to Process Bone Evidence for Forensic DNA Analysis
    Li, R.
    Klempner, S.
    Carter, D.
    Saenz, Y.
    IALM 2012: PRESENTATIONS FROM THE 22ND CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2013, : 265 - 268
  • [26] Likelihood ratio estimation in forensic identification using similarity and rarity
    Tang, Yi
    Srihari, Sargur N.
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2014, 47 (03) : 945 - 958
  • [27] Forensic Investigation and Validation of Energy Ratio Concept
    Timm, David H.
    Sholar, Gregory A.
    Kim, Jaeseung
    Willis, J. Richard
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2127) : 43 - 51
  • [28] Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2011, 51 (03) : 91 - 98
  • [29] What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2017, 57 (06) : 472 - 476
  • [30] Evaluation of evidence value of glass fragments by likelihood ratio and Bayesian Network approaches
    Zadora, G.
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 642 (1-2) : 279 - 290