Techno-economic and life cycle analysis of biofuel production via hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae in a methanol-water system and catalytic hydrotreatment using hydrochar as a catalyst support

被引:55
|
作者
Masoumi, Shima [1 ]
Dalai, Ajay K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Chem Engn, Catalysis & Chem Engn Labs, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2021年 / 151卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Algal biofuels; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Hydrodeoxygenation; Techno-economic analysis; Life cycle assessment; FUEL PRODUCTION; ALGAE; EMISSIONS; BIOCRUDE; IMPACT; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106168
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The hydrochar, a by-product of hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of algal biomass, was utilized through two methods; combustion and activation, for its usage as a source of heat and a catalyst support for hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) process in the production of algal biofuels. In this study, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of algal biofuels production in a two-stage process (HTL and HDO) were investigated. Aspen plus simulation and SimaPro software were used to analyze process economics and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Microalgae at 200 dry metric tonnes day-1 was the basis for its conversion to biocrude oil through HTL in the methanol-water system followed by catalytic upgrading to produce biofuels. According to HTL experimental results, maximum biocrude oil yield of 57.8 wt% was obtained using microalgaesolvent mass ratio and methanol-water mass ratio of 1:5 and 3:1, respectively. Produced biocrude oil contained 14.5 wt% of oxygen and HHV of 33.4 MJ kgbiocrude oil - 1 which required upgrading to be utilized as a transportation fuel. HDO was employed to enhance the quality of biocrude oil with decrease in oxygen content (3.1 wt%) and increase in HHV (42 MJ kgbiofuel - 1 ). The minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) for using method #2 (activation) was 2.2 $ L-1 to breakeven the cost of operation, which was about 10% lower than that from method #1 (combustion). The GHG emissions performance was estimated at -1.13 gCO2-eq MJ-1 indicating the significant GHG emissions reduction compared to petroleum-based fuels production.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from natural gas using current and emerging technologies
    Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh
    Saville, Bradley A.
    MacLean, Heather L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (30) : 18894 - 18909
  • [42] Sustainable production of methanol using landfill gas via carbon dioxide reforming and hydrogenation: Process development and techno-economic analysis
    Gao, Ruxing
    Zhang, Chundong
    Lee, Yun-Jo
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Jun, Ki-Won
    Kim, Seok Ki
    Park, Hae-Gu
    Guan, Guofeng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 272
  • [43] Techno-economic risk assessment, life cycle analysis and life cycle costing for poly(butylene succinate) and poly(lactic acid) production using renewable resources
    Ioannidou, Sofia Maria
    Ladakis, Dimitrios
    Moutousidi, Eleni
    Dheskali, Endrit
    Kookos, Ioannis K.
    Camara-Salim, Iana
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Koutinas, Apostolis
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 806
  • [44] Comparative Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Analysis of Water Oxidation and Hydrogen Oxidation at the Anode in a CO2 Electrolysis to Ethylene System
    Li, Wenqin
    Feaster, Jeremy T.
    Akhade, Sneha A.
    Davis, Jonathan T.
    Wong, Andrew A.
    Beck, Victor A.
    Varley, Joel B.
    Hawks, Steven A.
    Stadermann, Michael
    Hahn, Christopher
    Aines, Roger D.
    Duoss, Eric B.
    Baker, Sarah E.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (44) : 14678 - 14689
  • [45] Algal biofuel production for fuels and feed in a 100-ha facility: A comprehensive techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (vol 10, pg 266, 2015)
    Beal, Colin M.
    Gerber, Leda N.
    Sills, Deborah L.
    Huntley, Mark E.
    Machesky, Stephen C.
    Walsh, Michael J.
    Tester, Jefferson W.
    Archibald, Ian
    Granados, Joe
    Greene, Charles H.
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2015, 11 : 375 - 378
  • [46] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of fuel ethanol production via bio-oil fermentation based on a centralized-distribution model
    Zheng, Ji-Lu
    Zhu, Ya-Hong
    Su, Hong-Yu
    Sun, Guo-Tao
    Kang, Fu-Ren
    Zhu, Ming-Qiang
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 167
  • [47] Optimization of sustainable supply chain for bio-based isopropanol production from sugar beet using techno-economic and life cycle analysis
    Wen, Ching-Mei
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 191
  • [48] Techno-economic analysis of microalgae production with simultaneous dairy effluent treatment using a pilot-scale High Volume V-shape pond system
    Kumar, Adepu Kiran
    Sharma, Shaishav
    Dixit, Gaurav
    Shah, Ekta
    Patel, Aesha
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 (145) : 1620 - 1632
  • [49] Life cycle techno-economic and carbon footprint analysis of H2 production via NH3 decomposition: A Case study for the Republic of Korea
    Lim, Dongjun
    Kim, Ayeon
    Cheon, Seunghyun
    Byun, Manhee
    Lim, Hankwon
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 250
  • [50] Techno-economic and life-cycle analysis of single-step catalytic conversion of bioethanol to fuel blendstocks over Ni-doped HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst
    Anekwe, Ifeanyi Michael Smarte
    Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva
    Subramanian, K. A.
    Kozlov, Alexander
    Zhang, Shu
    Oboirien, Bilainu
    Isa, Yusuf Makarfi
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2024, 22